Addition of Warrant Officer ranks in the U.S. Air Force

Sign Now
petition image
As you know, the U.S. Air Force is the only branch of the United States Military that does not have the Warrant Officer ranks. We feel that this is unfair to the members of the Air Force, who work just as hard as members of the other branches, and can obtain the same degrees. In the other branches, an Enlisted member can obtain an Associates Degree in an approved field, and have experience in that field, and request training as a Warrant Officer. In the Air Force, the only step up for Enlisted members is to get a full Bachelors Degree, and apply for OTS, which has a very long waiting period, due to that being the only option. Because of this, the Air Force is losing out on very skilled personnel to be helicopter pilots, bomber air crews, etc.

There are currently Enlisted members who would gladly go to Warrant Officer training, and who are more than qualified for those ranks. There are Staff Sergeants with 2 associates degrees, a bachelors and working on their masters degrees, who can not go to OTS, as there is no room, who would be perfect candidates for Warrant Officer, and not need retraining for new specialty.

By instating the Warrant Officer ranks, it will show the Enlisted members of the U.S. Air Force that they can advance beyond the Enlisted ranks, and show their leadership abilities.

We ask that you, the Secretary of the Air Force, work to bring the Warrant Officer ranks to the Air Force.
Sign The Petition
OR

If you already have an account please sign in, otherwise register an account for free then sign the petition filling the fields below.
Email and password will be your account data, you will be able to sign other petitions after logging in.

Privacy in the search engines? You can use a nickname:

Attention, the email address you supply must be valid in order to validate the signature, otherwise it will be deleted.

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services
I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy
I agree to the Personal Data Processing
Shoutbox
Sign The Petition
OR

If you already have an account please sign in

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services
I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy
I agree to the Personal Data Processing
Goal
1,000 signatures
Goal: 5,000
Latest Signatures
1000. Richard Cunhapeabodym | Looks like this is where the angry CMSgts hang out? Well, that's too bad for them. I wouldn't mind becoming a Warrant Officer if it meant that I could give CMSgt Pate a double eye-gouge and putting CMSgt Jett into the cross faced chicken wing. I wonder if
999. Matthew C | I support this petition
998. Jacob T | I agree completely.
997. Henry R | I support this petition
996. Rosemary B | I support this petition
995. Mike A | Long overdue
994. Ssgt Colintc | Working on my Masters and would love to be a Warrant Officer.
993. Brett G | Loadmaster....
992. Jose F | I support this petition
991. William Ecoxj | Please implement the warrant officer program
990. Dean H | i have 2 degrees and would go Warrant
989. Anthony R | Enlisted with a masters degree
988. Wildcherry George | I support this petition
987. Manwell C | I support this petition
986. Darchelle Y | I support this petition
985. Robert F | I think the USAF has made a grave error in the decision to end the warrent officer program. At the time the TSgt had the same knowledge as the Warrant Officer, but now the USAF has changed so much with the combining of career fields the Warrant Officer is
984. Gary S | Even more important today for available folks to perform UAV flight ops.
983. Erin C | I support this petition
982. Kenneth Ak | us army cw2 and 1lt vietnam 1969/1969
981. Donald G | THIS IS AWESOME
980. Daniel B | USAF
979. Julius Pr | I support this petition
978. Ssgt Tylerw | I support this petition
977. S P | I support this petition
976. Burnett Ldeyerlei | I support this petition
browse all the signatures »
Information
In: -
Petition target:
Secretary of the Air Force
Tags
No tags
Embed Codes
direct link
link for html
link for forum without title
link for forum with title
728×90
468×60
336×280
125×125