Academic Freedom in Britain
Sign Now
We the undersigned members of the international academic community call upon the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology to abandon its inquiry into Professor Mona Bakers decision to sever links between her journals and Israeli universities.
Mona Bakers decision was taken in pursuance of an academic boycott of Israel. The claim that this infringed the academic freedom of the two Israeli academics she removed from the boards of her journals is entirely spurious: they remain as free as ever to say what they wish, and are, unlike Mona Baker, in no danger of dismissal. The claim that her decision was racially motivated is also entirely spurious and unwarranted: it depends on dishonestly equating criticism of the Israeli government with anti-Semitism.
The inquiry UMIST is conducting is a disciplinary procedure in all but name, except that Professor Baker has none of the protections of a defendant, such as the right to examine witnesses against her, to see their evidence, or even to know their identity. The Sunday Telegraph (UK) of November 17 quotes a UMIST official as saying that it will be decided by Christmas whether she will be dismissed, and UMISTs website carries an official statement condemning her in advance.
We regard this inquiry as a grave assault on academic freedom and the right to legitimate political activity and call upon UMIST to abandon it before the reputation of the university is further damaged.
Mona Bakers decision was taken in pursuance of an academic boycott of Israel. The claim that this infringed the academic freedom of the two Israeli academics she removed from the boards of her journals is entirely spurious: they remain as free as ever to say what they wish, and are, unlike Mona Baker, in no danger of dismissal. The claim that her decision was racially motivated is also entirely spurious and unwarranted: it depends on dishonestly equating criticism of the Israeli government with anti-Semitism.
The inquiry UMIST is conducting is a disciplinary procedure in all but name, except that Professor Baker has none of the protections of a defendant, such as the right to examine witnesses against her, to see their evidence, or even to know their identity. The Sunday Telegraph (UK) of November 17 quotes a UMIST official as saying that it will be decided by Christmas whether she will be dismissed, and UMISTs website carries an official statement condemning her in advance.
We regard this inquiry as a grave assault on academic freedom and the right to legitimate political activity and call upon UMIST to abandon it before the reputation of the university is further damaged.
Sign The Petition
Continue with Google
OR
If you already have an account please sign in, otherwise register an account for free then sign the petition filling the fields below.
Email and password will be your account data, you will be able to sign other petitions after logging in.
Shoutbox
Goal
800 signatures
Goal: 1,000
Latest Signatures
1 March 2016
29 February 2016
27 February 2016
25 February 2016
22 February 2016
13 February 2016
3 February 2016
1 February 2016
1 February 2016
27 January 2016
26 January 2016
22 January 2016
22 January 2016
14 January 2016
13 January 2016
12 January 2016
10 January 2016
1 January 2016
31 December 2015
28 December 2015
26 December 2015
20 December 2015
14 December 2015
13 December 2015
11 December 2015
Information
By:
Shauna Sloan
In:
-
Petition target:
Professor John Garside, Vice-Chancellor, University of Manchester Institute of Science & Technology (UK)
Professor John Garside, Vice-Chancellor, University of Manchester Institute of Science & Technology (UK)
Tags
No tags
Embed Codes
direct link
link for html
link for forum without title
link for forum with title
