BadForBusiness.org Online Petition Opposing the Proposed .biz/.info/.org Registry Agreements

Sign Now
petition image



     We, the undersigned, strongly oppose the current proposed .biz, .info and .org registry agreements. We are extremely concerned that these contracts are anti-competitive and open to abuse by for-profit companies that hold monopoly powers. Approval of these contracts is likely to cause serious harm to many small businesses on the Internet and severely limit the choices available to online consumers, resulting in higher prices. Even worse, approval of these contracts sets a dangerous precedent for the larger .com and .net registry operators to demand similar terms in their own contracts. The three primary causes for concern are:

Presumptive Renewal of Contracts without Competitive Bidding
Unrestricted Pricing Power in a Single Supplier Market
Unrestricted Use of Traffic Data

     These three provisions if approved could cause significant damage to the Internet by disrupting electronic commerce and impairing the free flow of information and opinion. Specifically, we believe that:

presumptive renewal of contracts without competitive bidding by other qualified suppliers is anti-competitive and poses a serious threat to the stability and security of the Internet. It removes all incentives for registry operators to offer competitive pricing and give their best efforts at network security. This encourages complacency, as they are virtually assured of perpetual contracts regardless of actual performance.
unrestricted pricing power in a single supplier market is open to abuse and allows the registry operators to exploit businesses, non-profit organizations and individuals. This provision is the equivalent of the energy commission granting regional monopolistic utilities indiscriminate rights to exploit consumers by raising the price of oil, gas and electricity. A strong possibility exists of variable pricing for different domains and could be viewed as extortion. Heavily trafficked sites such as Congress.org or RedCross.org could be forced to pay exorbitant sums or risk losing their well-known domain names. Another possibility is substantial uniform price increases that cannot be justified by any cost measures or price index. During past litigation, the Internet Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has argued that in a single supplier market, price caps are, if anything, procompetitive. The current proposals clearly contradict ICANNs earlier court testimony.
unrestricted use of traffic data may compromise individual privacy. The compiling, sharing, selling or other use of personal identifiable data may have additional negative consequences that are currently unforeseen. In conjunction with unrestricted pricing power, this provision can also be used to exploit businesses, non-profit organizations and individuals by setting different registration or renewal fees according to traffic data.

     Despite a near unanimous public opposition to the proposed registry agreements (.biz comments | .info comments | .org comments), the user community does not have a constituency within ICANN, a non-profit organization established by the U.S. Department of Commerce to oversee the Internet domain name system (DNS), with the goal of providing stability, competition, bottom-up coordination and representation. Market leading registrars including GoDaddy and Network Solutions are also vocal opponents of the proposed registry agreements.


     We, the undersigned, hereby petition members of Congress, to intervene in the proposed .biz, .info and .org registry contract negotiations in order to protect American public interest and welfare. We request that a coordinated effort with the U.S. Department of Commerce and U.S. Department of Justice be made to block the approval of these contracts and prohibit any future attempts of such anti-competitive behavior. All new proposed registry contracts should require broad dissemination and transparent negotiation processes to reflect the interests of a user constituency, which ICANN is obligated to protect.



Please help protect small businesses and online consumers by asking other people to sign the petition at BadForBusiness.org
Sign The Petition
OR

If you already have an account please sign in, otherwise register an account for free then sign the petition filling the fields below.
Email and password will be your account data, you will be able to sign other petitions after logging in.

Privacy in the search engines? You can use a nickname:

Attention, the email address you supply must be valid in order to validate the signature, otherwise it will be deleted.

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services
I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy
I agree to the Personal Data Processing
Shoutbox
Sign The Petition
OR

If you already have an account please sign in

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services
I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy
I agree to the Personal Data Processing
Goal
400 signatures
Goal: 1,000
Latest Signatures
400. Phil S | City State (or Country if outside of the U.S.) AZ В
399. Matt C | I support this petition
398. Brett Gates | I support this petition
397. Andrew H | City State (or Country if outside of the U.S.) UK В
396. Edgar Villarreal | I support this petition
395. Robert F | City State (or Country if outside of the U.S.) Chico, California I really can't believe this. Very unfair.
394. Daniel R | I support this petition
393. Michael S | I support this petition
392. Gavin D | City State (or Country if outside of the U.S.) В В
391. Martin R | I support this petition
390. Kevin M | I support this petition
389. Holger L | I support this petition
388. Edward T | I support this petition
387. Max M | City State (or Country if outside of the U.S.) Greensboro, NC If ICANN allow discriminatory price increases on .biz/.info/.org domains, then they will have achieved a monumental failure of the public trust and in their oversight of the internet.
386. James M | I support this petition
385. David H | I support this petition
384. Richard L | I support this petition
383. Denise L | I support this petition
382. William Giffordtotmani | I support this petition
381. John J | City State (or Country if outside of the U.S.) Nashville, TN В
380. Andrew M | City State (or Country if outside of the U.S.) Columbia, SC Please do not allow these price controls to be lifted on these domain exensions. It'll be a terrible blow to small business and the non-profit sector, and could strongly hinder the free exchange
379. John S | I support this petition
378. William T | City State (or Country if outside of the U.S.) Indonesia This will ruin small online businesses, some of which have taken years to build up. What you are proposing is only of benefit to large companies with deep pockets. For the sake of protecting the li
377. Karen B | City State (or Country if outside of the U.S.) Canada Please keep it fair for everyone..
376. Joe A | I support this petition
browse all the signatures »
Information
In: -
Petition target:
Members of U.S. Congress and other interested parties
Tags
No tags
Embed Codes
direct link
link for html
link for forum without title
link for forum with title
728×90
468×60
336×280
125×125