Remove corrupt Maryland Court of Special Appeal Judge Fredrick Sharer

Claim: Corrupt Maryland Court of Special Appeals Judge Fredrick Sharer overturned case based on the Defendant Genox Corporation fraudulent use and claim of a post Trial document as Иevidence before the Trial CourtЙ.

Why: I am writing this in hopes to warn other common folk and business entrepreneurs that the Maryland courts are corrupt and yield to big business and lawyers. I do not recommend starting a small or medium size business in Maryland with Judge Fredrick Sharer in office. I have learned the hard way that Maryland Judges are corrupt, prejudges, and have no accountability for their Judgments - in other words there are no checks and balances. If someone has enough money they can come in and take your business and blatantly steal your intellectual property and then hire lawyers to protect themselves. Money controls our Judges!

What: In a Baltimore City Circuit Court Trial (case no. 24-C00-04799) Genox Board of Directors: Hirotomo Ochi and Rama Rathnam were found guilty of oppression of minority shareholders and illegally diluting the minority shareholderЗs stock holdings while unjustly enriching their holdings in the company. A Judgment was made against GenoxЗs board to buyout the minority shareholders.
Since multibillion-dollar Japanese company Nikken Foods was really funding GenoxЗs legal team they had the money to file for an appeal in MarylandЗs Court of Special Appeals. Surprisingly the Special Appeals Judge Fredrick Sharer allowed Genox to use a post Trial document that was never submitted for evidence as the sole bases for a new argument in the case. GenoxЗs Appeal Record Extract and Brief fraudulently used and claimed that the post Trial document was Иevidence before the Trial CourtЙ in the Defendant/Appellant GenoxЗs statements of facts and arguments before the Court of Special Appeals (case no: 00388). I was also denied my right to cross-examine the authenticity and origin of the new material. After given the Judicial system full discloser and as many chances as possible to correct their mistake the only motive left for the Courts to have made such a decision must be from corruption of our state officials. I believe it is my civil duty to help our state and country maintain its fairness and civil peace. This case has caused me to begin developing a website to call-out corruption in our Judicial system so that the citizens will have a public notice and be linked to a petition so that the corrupt public officials can be voted out.
How does this Court decision really affect the people of Maryland and the publicЗs interest?
1) If the mandate stands, then it is one more example of a corrupt system and will further erode the publicЗs opinion of lawyers, Judges and the Judicial system.
2) I was a founding entrepreneur and scientist of Genox Corporation whose business was developing medical diagnostic assays and a state-of-the-art clinical facility for experimental testing of the assays in human epidemiology studies; mainly with Johns Hopkins Medical University. As the company became successful it drew the attention of a Japanese company called Nikken Foods who invested in Genox but then sent in a mole (Rama Rathnam) to steal the intellectual property of Genox and set it up in Japan (i.e. corporate espionage which is a federal offense). This action lost millions of dollars for Genox and caused the founders and scientist who developed these innovative tests to leave the company. As show at the Trial, the Japanese company Nikken has financially benefited and is heavily marketing the stolen technology to the Japan Ministry of Health and publicly. While Genox, a Maryland company, has been loosing money since the takeover and has not further developed the medical diagnostic technology, which I believe greatly hurts our health care system, employment rate, and the states income from taxes.
What Nikken has done is to pay $$$$ to D.C. lawyers to cover up their theft.

My petition to the Court of Appeals (i.e. Chief Judge Robert Bell) was for the judicial review of a claim of fraud and manufacturing of evidence by the Respondent Genox Corporation in their Appellate Brief to the Court of Special Appeals. I was asking the Court to take a little time to review the Baltimore Circuit Court case no. 24-C00-04799 Court Records and see the insertion of manufactured documents that the DefendantЗs fraudulently put in the Appeal Record Extract (page E291) and then claimed in their Brief that it was case evidence. The fraudulent document (record docket #00006000) was given to the Baltimore Circuit Court in a post Trial Motion to Reconsider Judgment (10 days after Trial and Judgment), which was Denied by the Baltimore Circuit Court. The new documents were never asked to be considered as new evidence by Genox and were Denied all consideration by the Circuit Court. Genox then claimed in their Appeal Brief that the fraudulent document was the Иevidence before the Trial CourtЙ, which was an out right lie to the Court of Special Appeals.