Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) - Response to NTIA, RUS Request for Information -
Sign Now
ATTENTION: ALL AMERICAN CITIZENS, THEIR COMMUNITIES, MUNICIPALITIES, CITIES AND COUNTIES
AGENCIES AND PROGRAMS: THE FCC, THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NTIA, THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE RUS, THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT (ARRA), THE BROADBAND TECHNOLOGY OPPORTUNITIES PROGRAM (BTOP)
RE: LICENSED BROADBAND SPECTRUM (2.5GHz EBS) THAT WAS ALLOWED TO BE TAKEN FROM OUR LOCAL COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES, SCHOOL BOARDS, CHURCHES, CITIZENS, COMMUNITIES, MUNICIPALITIES, CITIES AND COUNTIES
Introduction
Almost 40 years ago the FCC assigned a piece of spectrum for which our local colleges, universities, school boards, churches and other non-profits could broadcast educational material and other distributed informational or learning content. This spectrum was referred to as the Instructional Television Fixed Spectrum (ITFS) and the non-profits were FCC licensees of that spectrum.
In 2004, the FCC made changes to policy and rules regarding this spectrum and made it available for commercial broadband services. It is now called the Educational Broadband Service (EBS). This wireless spectrum (referred to as 2.5GHz EBS) is very suitable for fixed, nomadic and mobile broadband communications and internet access more commonly known as 4G or WiMAX.
Needless to say, as a result of the policy and rule changes this spectrum went from swamp land to ocean front property overnight. As part of the new rule changes the non-profit licensees still maintained control of their spectrum license and had the option of leasing the spectrum to qualified bidders.
These EBS licensees were then approached by Sprint Nextel and/or Clearwire with checkbooks in hand, as non-profit EBS licensees clamored to check on the status of their current EBS license with the FCC. In most cases, these licenses needed to be renewed and in some cases the licensee (non-profit Boards of Trustees) was not even aware they had rights to this Community asset.
At this time Sprint/Nextel and Clearwire aggressively pursued long term lease arrangements with then current licensees of the EBS spectrum. This licensed spectrum was well suited for Wi-Fis big brother WiMAX, which was gaining strength in the marketplace as the next generation wireless technology.
These non-profits were told by Sprint Nextel and Clearwire that the costs involved in building out development and deployment of their spectrum would be very high so in the eyes of the decision makers, namely Boards of Trustees (who, in most cases, are dis-attached from newer technology), it made sense to adhere to the lucrative offers (in their eyes) from these large companies.
If the current 2.5GHz licensees would have performed more due diligence on their asset they would have realized that the costs involved in rolling out their spectrum would have been very expensive at that time, based on product availability and standards of that time.
All they would have had to do is look at the current Wi-Fi (802.11) market to realize that more equipment manufacturers would be entering the WiMAX marketplace in the future and that costs would be reduced dramatically, much like Wi-Fi is inexpensive now.
On a more simple level, due diligence could have been done by searching WiMAX and researchers would have had all the information they needed to get started on a proper due diligence processes.
However, this did not happen and the lure of the cash was to tempting. This also led to a snowball effect that gathered these EBS licensees in groves throughout our Country, all falling prey to questionable business tactics by Sprint Nextel and Clearwire. In fact, these lease deals are also going to be investigated by congress and consumer advocacy groups and patent law suits are pending.
To paraphrase eminent outside Counsel that advised upon and completed many of these lease deals it is all about who is offering the most money [Sprint/Nextel or Clearwire] and addressing the immediate needs of cash starved non-profits, their faculty, students, or constituents.
It became a competition of sorts, a competition to see who could offer the most money, and of course Sprint Nextel and Clearwire had the resources to blow local providers away. At no point did Boards of Trustees entertain the thought of possibly being able to build out infrastructure for this spectrum on their own, partnering with Municipalities, Cities and Counties, partnering with Private Sector monies and offering low cost, high speed fixed, nomadic and mobile wireless broadband services for their citizenry, households and local businesses.
As these lease deals represented a significant windfall for non-profits, it is dwarfed by the amount of revenues that will be generated through WiMAX services within any geographical service area (GSA).
This valuable piece of spectrum should be given back to their respective non-profit licensees and these long term leases should be re-worked. This is based upon the new economic downturn, the need for the creation of new jobs, the need for advanced broadband wireless infrastructures for our Communities, Municipalities, Cities and Counties, and most of all, the right of the American people to define their own broadband future.
The following benefits are facilitated by building out core broadband infrastructure in the Community 2.5GHz EBS spectrum:
Enhanced Public Safety, First Responder Applications
High speed low cost ubiquitous fixed, nomadic and mobile broadband wireless communications and internet access for Urban, Suburban and Rural markets
Municipal Departmental Applications
Reduced cost communications and internet core access for residents, businesses, visitors and tourists
VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol using any qualified provider or proprietary build)
Health Care and TeleMedicine Services
Digital Access, Inclusion, Literacy Programs (Low-Income Households)
Economic Stimulus
Destination Market services, portals and applications
Public access television
Public Utility Services
Local business internet marketing services, residential, and community portals
Deploy New Energy Technologies / Energy Management Services (EMS) / Green Initiatives
Matching rebate scheduling and/or energy credits through the State Energy Offices
School system enhancements / Educational tools
Public Employee Services
VPNs / VARs / Reseller Services
Employer Outreach / Distance Learning & Training
Exponential Job Creation by providing core communications and internet access in Urban, Suburban and Rural markets
Visitor Services / Hospitality Packages
Private Security / Video Surveillance / DVR Remote Access
Digital Connectors Programs for Low-Income Individuals and Households
The Petition
Whereas Congress, the FCC and Boards of Trustees allowed Sprint Nextel and Clearwire (using very questionable business tactics) to coerce our local Colleges, Universities, School Boards, Churches and other non-profits into signing long term leases of the 2.5GHz EBS spectrum of which could be considered a very valuable Community asset.
Whereas Sprint Nextel and Clearwire dictated terms of these lease agreements at extremely undervalued monetary consideration.
Whereas the FCC did not educate the past ITFS Association on the potential uses and value of their ITFS spectrum (now the EBS) prior to issuing policy and rule changes.
Whereas the FCC saw the perpetuating trend in lease signings by Sprint Nextel and Clearwire and allowed a Monopoly to be formed. (Sprint and Clearwire merged spectral assets, approved on Election Day, 2008 by the FCC and Congress).
Whereas the FCC allowed Sprint Nextel and Clearwire (and their Holding Companies) to obtain long term lease rights to the EBS spectrum in over eighty-five (85\%) percent of major Metropolitan Service Areas (MSAs) and markets within the United States.
Whereas the Boards of Trustees as decision makers for the non-profits (licensees) were unaware, uneducated, unknowledgeable, naпve, dis-attached and coerced in their decision making processes in leasing their spectrum to Sprint Nextel and Clearwire.
Whereas the Boards of Trustees made decisions based solely upon the needs of their constituency without taking into account the needs for ubiquitous broadband wireless services for local Communities, Municipalities, Cities and Counties within their Geographical Service Area (GSA 35 mile radius per license).
Whereas the Boards of Trustees and Congress, in their assignments, did not perform proper due diligence on the potential value of this asset to the general populous of Communities, Municipalities, Cities or Counties in which their spectrum covered. (35 mile radius per license).
Whereas Congress and Boards of Trustees did not invite increased levels of Public participation, input and comment periods prior to lease signings.
Whereas Sprint Nextel, Clearwire and Boards of Trustees did not provide details of their lease arrangements to the Public.
We, the American people demand:
Complete accountability, oversight and transparency regarding current lease arrangements with EBS licensees including public posting of all lease agreements, monetary considerations, and GSA coverage areas.
A complete investigation and interviews of Boards of Trustees and assignees involved in the decision making processes regarding long term leases of their Community 2.5GHz EBS spectrum.
A complete review of EBS licensees and licenses, how they are currently utilizing their spectrum and current availability of upper channel licenses that may not be under lease.
A complete revamp of this flawed and discriminatory process allowing current EBS licensees to issue new RFIs/RFP's regarding build out of core infrastructure in their licensed EBS 2.5GHz spectrum and other synergistic licensed and unlicensed spectrum.
A complete revamp of this flawed and discriminatory process allowing formation of local Public/Private Partnerships to oversee and provide transparency regarding all aspects of network development, deployment and operations.
A complete revamp of this flawed and discriminatory process allowing Private Sector Investment to evaluate, advise upon, and provide funding for Community, Municipal, City or County wide broadband infrastructures.
A complete restructuring of the lease agreements allowing Sprint and Clearwire, amongst other service providers, application service providers, resellers and VARs to lease use on the spectrum.
A complete evaluation leading to fundamental improvements in managing the 2.5GHz EBS to fully exploit the synergies available regarding the new American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) as a whole and the potential benefits to the Department of Commerce NTIA and Department of Agriculture RUS Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) as prescribed by section 6001(k) of the ARRA.
This is an extremely important issue and if the American people do not speak up now we will be ever beholding to our Telecommunications and Cable behemoths that now control our broadband future. We are the asset here and we need to be in control to keep costs low, and define our own broadband futures.
Thank you,
Brad Bowman
Program Director, AccessDelray.org
http://www.accessdelray.org
[email protected]
More information on the NTIA/RUS Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) - http://www.ntia.doc.gov/broadbandgrants/
Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) - Response to Request for Information (Complete Summary) http://www.accessdelray.org or
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/broadbandgrants/comment.cfm?e=88EB9581-8025-40EA-B81A-13A50B707C9E
AGENCIES AND PROGRAMS: THE FCC, THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NTIA, THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE RUS, THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT (ARRA), THE BROADBAND TECHNOLOGY OPPORTUNITIES PROGRAM (BTOP)
RE: LICENSED BROADBAND SPECTRUM (2.5GHz EBS) THAT WAS ALLOWED TO BE TAKEN FROM OUR LOCAL COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES, SCHOOL BOARDS, CHURCHES, CITIZENS, COMMUNITIES, MUNICIPALITIES, CITIES AND COUNTIES
Introduction
Almost 40 years ago the FCC assigned a piece of spectrum for which our local colleges, universities, school boards, churches and other non-profits could broadcast educational material and other distributed informational or learning content. This spectrum was referred to as the Instructional Television Fixed Spectrum (ITFS) and the non-profits were FCC licensees of that spectrum.
In 2004, the FCC made changes to policy and rules regarding this spectrum and made it available for commercial broadband services. It is now called the Educational Broadband Service (EBS). This wireless spectrum (referred to as 2.5GHz EBS) is very suitable for fixed, nomadic and mobile broadband communications and internet access more commonly known as 4G or WiMAX.
Needless to say, as a result of the policy and rule changes this spectrum went from swamp land to ocean front property overnight. As part of the new rule changes the non-profit licensees still maintained control of their spectrum license and had the option of leasing the spectrum to qualified bidders.
These EBS licensees were then approached by Sprint Nextel and/or Clearwire with checkbooks in hand, as non-profit EBS licensees clamored to check on the status of their current EBS license with the FCC. In most cases, these licenses needed to be renewed and in some cases the licensee (non-profit Boards of Trustees) was not even aware they had rights to this Community asset.
At this time Sprint/Nextel and Clearwire aggressively pursued long term lease arrangements with then current licensees of the EBS spectrum. This licensed spectrum was well suited for Wi-Fis big brother WiMAX, which was gaining strength in the marketplace as the next generation wireless technology.
These non-profits were told by Sprint Nextel and Clearwire that the costs involved in building out development and deployment of their spectrum would be very high so in the eyes of the decision makers, namely Boards of Trustees (who, in most cases, are dis-attached from newer technology), it made sense to adhere to the lucrative offers (in their eyes) from these large companies.
If the current 2.5GHz licensees would have performed more due diligence on their asset they would have realized that the costs involved in rolling out their spectrum would have been very expensive at that time, based on product availability and standards of that time.
All they would have had to do is look at the current Wi-Fi (802.11) market to realize that more equipment manufacturers would be entering the WiMAX marketplace in the future and that costs would be reduced dramatically, much like Wi-Fi is inexpensive now.
On a more simple level, due diligence could have been done by searching WiMAX and researchers would have had all the information they needed to get started on a proper due diligence processes.
However, this did not happen and the lure of the cash was to tempting. This also led to a snowball effect that gathered these EBS licensees in groves throughout our Country, all falling prey to questionable business tactics by Sprint Nextel and Clearwire. In fact, these lease deals are also going to be investigated by congress and consumer advocacy groups and patent law suits are pending.
To paraphrase eminent outside Counsel that advised upon and completed many of these lease deals it is all about who is offering the most money [Sprint/Nextel or Clearwire] and addressing the immediate needs of cash starved non-profits, their faculty, students, or constituents.
It became a competition of sorts, a competition to see who could offer the most money, and of course Sprint Nextel and Clearwire had the resources to blow local providers away. At no point did Boards of Trustees entertain the thought of possibly being able to build out infrastructure for this spectrum on their own, partnering with Municipalities, Cities and Counties, partnering with Private Sector monies and offering low cost, high speed fixed, nomadic and mobile wireless broadband services for their citizenry, households and local businesses.
As these lease deals represented a significant windfall for non-profits, it is dwarfed by the amount of revenues that will be generated through WiMAX services within any geographical service area (GSA).
This valuable piece of spectrum should be given back to their respective non-profit licensees and these long term leases should be re-worked. This is based upon the new economic downturn, the need for the creation of new jobs, the need for advanced broadband wireless infrastructures for our Communities, Municipalities, Cities and Counties, and most of all, the right of the American people to define their own broadband future.
The following benefits are facilitated by building out core broadband infrastructure in the Community 2.5GHz EBS spectrum:
Enhanced Public Safety, First Responder Applications
High speed low cost ubiquitous fixed, nomadic and mobile broadband wireless communications and internet access for Urban, Suburban and Rural markets
Municipal Departmental Applications
Reduced cost communications and internet core access for residents, businesses, visitors and tourists
VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol using any qualified provider or proprietary build)
Health Care and TeleMedicine Services
Digital Access, Inclusion, Literacy Programs (Low-Income Households)
Economic Stimulus
Destination Market services, portals and applications
Public access television
Public Utility Services
Local business internet marketing services, residential, and community portals
Deploy New Energy Technologies / Energy Management Services (EMS) / Green Initiatives
Matching rebate scheduling and/or energy credits through the State Energy Offices
School system enhancements / Educational tools
Public Employee Services
VPNs / VARs / Reseller Services
Employer Outreach / Distance Learning & Training
Exponential Job Creation by providing core communications and internet access in Urban, Suburban and Rural markets
Visitor Services / Hospitality Packages
Private Security / Video Surveillance / DVR Remote Access
Digital Connectors Programs for Low-Income Individuals and Households
The Petition
Whereas Congress, the FCC and Boards of Trustees allowed Sprint Nextel and Clearwire (using very questionable business tactics) to coerce our local Colleges, Universities, School Boards, Churches and other non-profits into signing long term leases of the 2.5GHz EBS spectrum of which could be considered a very valuable Community asset.
Whereas Sprint Nextel and Clearwire dictated terms of these lease agreements at extremely undervalued monetary consideration.
Whereas the FCC did not educate the past ITFS Association on the potential uses and value of their ITFS spectrum (now the EBS) prior to issuing policy and rule changes.
Whereas the FCC saw the perpetuating trend in lease signings by Sprint Nextel and Clearwire and allowed a Monopoly to be formed. (Sprint and Clearwire merged spectral assets, approved on Election Day, 2008 by the FCC and Congress).
Whereas the FCC allowed Sprint Nextel and Clearwire (and their Holding Companies) to obtain long term lease rights to the EBS spectrum in over eighty-five (85\%) percent of major Metropolitan Service Areas (MSAs) and markets within the United States.
Whereas the Boards of Trustees as decision makers for the non-profits (licensees) were unaware, uneducated, unknowledgeable, naпve, dis-attached and coerced in their decision making processes in leasing their spectrum to Sprint Nextel and Clearwire.
Whereas the Boards of Trustees made decisions based solely upon the needs of their constituency without taking into account the needs for ubiquitous broadband wireless services for local Communities, Municipalities, Cities and Counties within their Geographical Service Area (GSA 35 mile radius per license).
Whereas the Boards of Trustees and Congress, in their assignments, did not perform proper due diligence on the potential value of this asset to the general populous of Communities, Municipalities, Cities or Counties in which their spectrum covered. (35 mile radius per license).
Whereas Congress and Boards of Trustees did not invite increased levels of Public participation, input and comment periods prior to lease signings.
Whereas Sprint Nextel, Clearwire and Boards of Trustees did not provide details of their lease arrangements to the Public.
We, the American people demand:
Complete accountability, oversight and transparency regarding current lease arrangements with EBS licensees including public posting of all lease agreements, monetary considerations, and GSA coverage areas.
A complete investigation and interviews of Boards of Trustees and assignees involved in the decision making processes regarding long term leases of their Community 2.5GHz EBS spectrum.
A complete review of EBS licensees and licenses, how they are currently utilizing their spectrum and current availability of upper channel licenses that may not be under lease.
A complete revamp of this flawed and discriminatory process allowing current EBS licensees to issue new RFIs/RFP's regarding build out of core infrastructure in their licensed EBS 2.5GHz spectrum and other synergistic licensed and unlicensed spectrum.
A complete revamp of this flawed and discriminatory process allowing formation of local Public/Private Partnerships to oversee and provide transparency regarding all aspects of network development, deployment and operations.
A complete revamp of this flawed and discriminatory process allowing Private Sector Investment to evaluate, advise upon, and provide funding for Community, Municipal, City or County wide broadband infrastructures.
A complete restructuring of the lease agreements allowing Sprint and Clearwire, amongst other service providers, application service providers, resellers and VARs to lease use on the spectrum.
A complete evaluation leading to fundamental improvements in managing the 2.5GHz EBS to fully exploit the synergies available regarding the new American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) as a whole and the potential benefits to the Department of Commerce NTIA and Department of Agriculture RUS Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) as prescribed by section 6001(k) of the ARRA.
This is an extremely important issue and if the American people do not speak up now we will be ever beholding to our Telecommunications and Cable behemoths that now control our broadband future. We are the asset here and we need to be in control to keep costs low, and define our own broadband futures.
Thank you,
Brad Bowman
Program Director, AccessDelray.org
http://www.accessdelray.org
[email protected]
More information on the NTIA/RUS Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) - http://www.ntia.doc.gov/broadbandgrants/
Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) - Response to Request for Information (Complete Summary) http://www.accessdelray.org or
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/broadbandgrants/comment.cfm?e=88EB9581-8025-40EA-B81A-13A50B707C9E
Sign The Petition
Continue with Google
OR
If you already have an account please sign in, otherwise register an account for free then sign the petition filling the fields below.
Email and password will be your account data, you will be able to sign other petitions after logging in.
Shoutbox
Goal
0 signatures
Goal: 50
Information
By:
Alejandra Waller
In:
-
Petition target:
The FCC, Dept. of Commerce NTIA, Dept. of Agriculture RUS, Recovery.gov, BTOP
The FCC, Dept. of Commerce NTIA, Dept. of Agriculture RUS, Recovery.gov, BTOP
Tags
No tags
Embed Codes
direct link
link for html
link for forum without title
link for forum with title
