NO Cell Tower in the Eureka Springs Historic District

Sign Now
petition image
PLEASE! No cell towers in the EUREKA SPRINGS Historic District!

We, the following citizens, residents, and community advocates of the City of Eureka Springs, and all relevant neighboring communities, at large do hereby:

OPPOSE the placement of a 180 cell tower to be located on Judah Street in Eureka Springs, Arkansas for the following reasons:

1. A visually disruptive cell tower does not belong in the Eureka Springs Historic District. Regarding cell tower installations, the Eureka Springs Historic District guidelines state: Installation may be permitted if the Commission determines that the placement does not have an adverse effect on the character-defining features of the existing structure, street, or the District as a whole.

The introduction of this structure into the landscape would forever alter the character of the community. The primary revenue source for the city of Eureka Springs is tourism, and our tourism industry is dependent on the citys ability to provide an extraordinary escape for its many tourist visitors. Eureka Springs is a vacation destination well-known for its historical healing springs, well-preserved Victorian architecture, and natural Ozark woodland surroundings. The proposed cell tower to be sited at the South entrance to the Eureka Springs Historic District would threaten this unique travel experience, thereby jeopardizing the welfare of local business owners and residents.

2. Tourists entering the Historic District from the main Planer Hill entrance will be greeted by a large cell tower atop the hill, instead of the charming Victorian architecture and natural beauty long advertised by the city. It will be the first structure they see entering town, and the last as they leave.

3. The zoning for the proposed site was changed from Residential to Commercial zoning as part of a request to build less visually obtrusive storage facilities. As soon as the zoning was approved, the proposed storage facility plan was replaced with this cell tower plan. We consider this to be a bait-and-switch tactic performed to skirt existing zoning regulations that prohibit cell tower construction in a Historic District Residential Zone.

4. The landowner (Bullock) and Smith Communications will benefit financially from this cell tower, but the large majority of residents and visitors WILL NOT. In fact, it is more likely that it will lower nearby residential property values, inducing residents to seek lower tax assessments as a result of this tower.

5. Smith Communications has NOT provided evidence that this is the least intrusive site possible and that a proposed cell tower within the Eureka Springs Historic District is absolutely necessary.

6. A tower 180 in height is directly out of scale with, and in great contrast to, the natural aesthetics of the surrounding area. The scenic view from nearby cultural, environmental and historic properties would be irrevocably altered by the introduction of a visual element that is unquestionably incompatible with the existing natural landscape.

7. Constructing a cell tower within the Eureka Springs Historic District would allow a historically inappropriate structure to be erected, setting a precedent for additional cell tower installations, destroying the existing character and marketability of the city, and discouraging further positive historic preservation in the area.

8. It is the will of the public that this structure NOT be built near the entrance to the Eureka Springs Historic District. The community has voiced this opinion at numerous public meetings, and the Planning Commission and City Council of Eureka Springs acted on behalf of concerned citizens in denying the CUP requested by Smith Communications. It is our belief that Smith Communications is now attempting to strong-arm the residents of Eureka Springs into accepting a historically inappropriate structure in the Eureka Springs Historic District against our will, and to the detriment of our unique tourism offerings.

In Conclusion:

The potential adverse effects on the community by the proposed cell tower must be strongly considered.

Less intrusive locations outside the Historic District and farther from Residential Zones must be thoroughly investigated. A more appropriate site would be one that can house a 180 cell tower and all accompanying equipment compounds and facilities, without having an adverse effect upon adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood and Historic District, its natural surroundings, and other factors affecting the public health, safety, and welfare. In assessing alternate locations, the legitimate need for a cell tower within the Historic District of Eureka Springs must be validated by independent communications experts and by resident Eureka Springs consumer survey.

PLEASE uphold the decision made by the local Eureka Springs Planning Commission and City Council to deny the construction of a 180 cell tower at the entrance to the Historic District of Eureka Springs.


Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sign The Petition
OR

If you already have an account please sign in, otherwise register an account for free then sign the petition filling the fields below.
Email and password will be your account data, you will be able to sign other petitions after logging in.

Privacy in the search engines? You can use a nickname:

Attention, the email address you supply must be valid in order to validate the signature, otherwise it will be deleted.

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services
I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy
I agree to the Personal Data Processing
Shoutbox
Sign The Petition
OR

If you already have an account please sign in

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services
I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy
I agree to the Personal Data Processing
Goal
100 signatures
Goal: 1,000
Latest Signatures
100. Janet M | I support this petition
99. Eduardo Cc | I support this petition
98. Claudia M | Zip Code 72632 The 180 ft cell tower by Smith Communications has not proved the need and does not belong in the Eureka Springs, Ar Historic District
97. Don H | I support this petition
96. David R | Zip Code 72207 It is our civic duty to safe guard the preservaion of the wonderful historic distric of Eureka Springs, Arkansas.
95. Thomas S | I support this petition
94. Daren G | Zip Code 72632 not needed, not wanted keep Eureka true.
93. Paul H | I support this petition
92. Cathy J | I support this petition
91. Frank E | I support this petition
90. Donna H | Zip Code 72632 100\% against this eyesore
89. Maureen G | I support this petition
88. Stephen Cb | Zip Code 75019 I am a travel writer and economic tourism development consultant. This is completley incompatible with a Historic District as successful as Eureka Springs. Please re-think and re-locate these towers to a less significant gateway. Thanks
87. Homer Jv | I support this petition
86. Rondugger P | I support this petition
85. Bob W | Zip Code 72631 try and put on 23 south
84. Patricia Am | I support this petition
83. Michael W | I support this petition
82. Elaine K | I support this petition
81. Cynthia M | Zip Code 72632 according to antennasearch.com - w/in 4 miles of the proposed tower there are already 7 'high structure' registered towers (typically 200 ft) and 3 'medium' unregistered towers (100-200) - the existing sbc/att tower on Magnetic Spg Rd is l
80. Marc Mc | Zip Code 72632 There are viable alternatives to this tower.
79. Michael A | Zip Code 72632 Do you really want to let greed and convenience trump people's rights and natural beauty? No? Then sign the petition.
78. Kay W | I support this petition
77. Alicia F | Zip Code 91761 Visitor of the area signing to preserve the historic beauty of Eureka Springs!
76. Charles W | I support this petition
browse all the signatures »
Information
In: -
Petition target:
local commissions, government officials, lawmakers
Tags
No tags
Embed Codes
direct link
link for html
link for forum without title
link for forum with title
728×90
468×60
336×280
125×125