Stop Manshead Tutor Regime Changes
Sign Now
We the undersigned disagree with several aspects of the proposed tutor regime and think it would not benefit students in their education.
We feel that morning registration is imperative to tackling truancy and that removal of it will not make the problem any better. We also feel that some free time in the morning is vital to allow students to properly wake up and prepare for the day. We also feel that by making this change it is making registration seem less important so some students would not feel obligated to attend.
We feel that we would much rather interact with people of a similar maturity level. As older students we feel that we are currently able to mentor each other as equals but a smaller group of younger students would take away this opportunity. We feel we are obligated to mentor the younger years while receiving little from them, especially unpleasant and under-motivated students with whom we would rather not interact with.
We feel that Learning Group periods would take away from our education time, which we feel is more important. We also feel that we would rather not spend an hour a week participating in activities with students we dont want to interact with, due to their immaturity. As Sixth Formers we feel that a Learning Guide would be a hindrance and become an obstruction to our independent learning.
We feel that having 6 colleges overcomplicates the house system and makes events more difficult to organise. It would also not improve turnout and would also lead to a lesser amount of extra curricular participation.
Overall we feel the current system benefits us more than the new system which would hinder us more than help.
We feel that morning registration is imperative to tackling truancy and that removal of it will not make the problem any better. We also feel that some free time in the morning is vital to allow students to properly wake up and prepare for the day. We also feel that by making this change it is making registration seem less important so some students would not feel obligated to attend.
We feel that we would much rather interact with people of a similar maturity level. As older students we feel that we are currently able to mentor each other as equals but a smaller group of younger students would take away this opportunity. We feel we are obligated to mentor the younger years while receiving little from them, especially unpleasant and under-motivated students with whom we would rather not interact with.
We feel that Learning Group periods would take away from our education time, which we feel is more important. We also feel that we would rather not spend an hour a week participating in activities with students we dont want to interact with, due to their immaturity. As Sixth Formers we feel that a Learning Guide would be a hindrance and become an obstruction to our independent learning.
We feel that having 6 colleges overcomplicates the house system and makes events more difficult to organise. It would also not improve turnout and would also lead to a lesser amount of extra curricular participation.
Overall we feel the current system benefits us more than the new system which would hinder us more than help.
Sign The Petition
Continue with Google
OR
If you already have an account please sign in, otherwise register an account for free then sign the petition filling the fields below.
Email and password will be your account data, you will be able to sign other petitions after logging in.
Shoutbox
Goal
100 signatures
Goal: 1,000
Latest Signatures
14 December 2015
100.
Katie L
|
Tutor Group
9C1
Additional
I think its all a stupid idea. Whats the piont of trying to fix something thats not broken. It'll just confuss everyone!!
10 December 2015
10 December 2015
19 September 2015
97.
Holly S
|
Tutor Group
10a2
Additional
This is a silly idea: younger ones will feel more intimidated, older one's will refuse to co-operate and has anyone thought about Sports day? How long will it take for all SIX houses to compete in every sport? A long time is m
15 September 2015
96.
Anon Goodwin
|
Tutor Group
10
Additional
If they can make smaller tutor groups of mixed ages why cant they make smaller groups of one age.
8 September 2015
5 September 2015
29 August 2015
26 July 2015
16 June 2015
16 June 2015
26 March 2015
22 February 2015
13 December 2014
26 November 2014
86.
Breeden Wheeler
|
Tutor Group
11C3
Additional
we would rather mix with mature students our own age. not younger.
25 August 2014
85.
Kris L
|
Tutor Group
10B4
Additional
(Insert snooty anti-pre-sixth-form comment here) Mm. Yes. We're so VERY immature; it would be a complete injustice to let the sixth formers mix with us! We'll go back to "learning" in our holes now.
19 July 2014
5 June 2014
3 June 2014
82.
Hazel Friedman
|
Tutor Group
11c2
Additional
what is the point? the system is fine as it is! why mess up a good thing?
18 April 2014
81.
Tom C
|
Tutor Group
9c4
Additional
got man wots the point its bull **** no 1 gunna like it, it dnt benifit no 1 so dnt have it
11 April 2014
3 March 2014
79.
Emma Taylor
|
Tutor Group
11B2
Additional
i really dislike the new changes especially mixed tutor groups, because i will be in sixth form next year and we are suppose to be treated like adults therefore, we should have the right to have registration separately from th
13 February 2014
26 October 2013
77.
Kieran B
|
Tutor Group
10B1
Additional
I would rather stay in my current form class. It is more coherent to stay with friends as if we had to mix with older students I would feel insequre and uncomfortable.
3 October 2013
76.
Rach Juarez
|
Tutor Group
11A2
Additional
well i dont really think its right putting year 9's with 10s&11s and sixth formers (me&many next year sixth formers)..dont think it will benifit us really..pointless ina way, just keep the tutor groups the same but ovi
Tags
No tags
Embed Codes
direct link
link for html
link for forum without title
link for forum with title
