Against Changing the Child Actors of Harry Potter.

"They are all great at acting and there have been hundreds of movies made with people no where near the age of the character they play. Plus I would kill myself if they replaced Emma Watson, she is obviously the best teenage actress in history and I cannot"

"they better stay! they're just too good for the parts to go. also, all the movie fans now know the actor's faces as their characters, so if they leave, it will be ODD! age 15"

"dont take emma out shes 13 not older"

"no address caracas, Venezuela"

"YOU BASTERDS CAN'T CHANGE THE ACTORS!!! as the books go on the characters get older, shouldn't that be fine with the movies??"

"... please, NO! address via dei Salici, 27 age 13"

"I think it is wrong to change the actors because they have given up their time and effort for this movie. Everyone should have known they were going to get older plus the characters can't stay the same age forever. age 11"

"It just wouldn't be the same."

"NO!! Don't change them! They are fantastic actors! And bullocks to them being too old! They have 20-somethings playing teenagers in other movies/shows, so why couldn't these kids continue?! They're not even going to be that old anyways, they would be agin"

"I really hope they keep emma dan and rupert because they fit their parts and they are perfect for there parts, i would hate for them to have to change. age 14"

"sign twice"

"DO NOT CHANGE THEM!!! It would be like changing Friends cast, or replace Matt Groening for another guy (in a word: CHATASTROPHIC!!!!!) age 15"

"the actors should not be replaced. people are attached to these actors; replacing them would change the entire series and even the way people see the characters as they read the books.. this would be BAD... do not replace them. age 16"