Against Changing the Child Actors of Harry Potter.

"В address В age 15"

"emma watson is thinking about not coming back to do the other movies...please make her do more PLEASE PLEASE OR IT WILL NOT GET GOOD RATINGS"

"They had better not change the actors! Emma, Daniel, and Rupert are AWESOME! No one could do a better job than them! age 13"

"Dont do it age 16"

"DONT CHANGE TOM FELTONS CHARACTER!"

"Don't do it!"

"I am glad someone is saying , "You know what we don't want these charecters to be changed!!" I think that if they change the actores they will lose a lot of fans that's for sure! Like me & a lot of my friends. I think evryone would be very dissapointe"

"The actors of the Harry Potter who are playing teen parts are not supposed to look like they are 12 years old! Replacing them for a yonger looking cast is crazy and if this would ever happen I would not see the movie. I understand of course why Dumbledore"

"They can't change them! That would ruin the movies even worst than they already do. age 19"

"i think it is vital for the films success that they keep the child actors as it will only confuse the general audience and children plus they're well FIT.INNIT!!! age sicksteen"

"Alfonso Cuarпїn commented on this some time ago, stating that the Dan, Rupert and Emma were going to age a few years beyond their roles, but would likely not grow a third eyeball on their forehead or do anything else to significantly hamper their performa"

"They fit their role so perfectly that it would be painful to see anyone else in there roles... age 17"

"the movie wouldn't be the same without them. i would not see it if the actors were changed."

"The kids are the characters, change this, and you will lose the audience of children and adults alike. age 20"

"Don't recast! Please don't recast! I think if you do, you'll kill everything Harry Potter stands for. I want to watch these kids grow up and into their roles! Please, please, please don't recast!!!!!! address Iowa age 17"