Against Intelligent Design Creationism in Ohio

Note: The Ohio board of education is considering inserting "Intelligent Design" creationism into the K-12 public school science standards. For more information on this issue, please consult the Ohio C... continue reading »

1,000 signatures Goal: 1,000
All Signatures (1,000 total)
276.
Nicholas Dm 1 July 2015
277.
Russell Lm 1 July 2015

"Address Cleveland, Ohio ID is not science"

278.
Brian S 29 June 2015
279.
Dion S 29 June 2015
280.
Betty Fc 28 June 2015
281.
Frank S 27 June 2015
282.
Keith Mannp 24 June 2015
283.
Kurt H 22 June 2015

"It is not appropriate to teach ID along with scientific theories as there is not scientific basis, or evidence, for ID"

284.
Jill B 22 June 2015
285.
Linda S 22 June 2015
286.
Matthew U 22 June 2015

"Only SCIENCE in science class, please!"

287.
Richard Mk 21 June 2015

"Address В В"

288.
Billy H 21 June 2015

"Address В Narrow-minded religious zealouts represent the ill-fated direction that our country currently leads."

289.
Barb E 20 June 2015
290.
Kim B 19 June 2015
291.
Darren T 19 June 2015
292.
Brian Bagattophdb 19 June 2015

"Address University of Akron This curriculum absolutely does not convey ideas which are testable using scientific experimentation. This simply cannot be classified as science. Even though I have no problem with the concept of ID/creationism, it has been a"

293.
Annabelle F 19 June 2015
294.
David N 17 June 2015

"Address Australia No one has the right to limit a child's mind in this manner. It is tantamount to child abuse to do so."

295.
Gregory S 16 June 2015

"Address 4010 W 143 St. Cleveland, OH 11435 Science classes should be for teaching science; religion should be taught in religion classes"

296.
Joseph Gathmanp 12 June 2015

"Address 854 Iglehart Ave., St. Paul, MN 55104 I am a professional ecologist/zoologist. I support my colleagues in noting that ID is NOT science."

297.
Nancy Buschhausp 11 June 2015
298.
Michael Hb 11 June 2015
299.
Jay C 11 June 2015

"This is really dumb that anyone would deny what science is putting in front of them, especially with a theory that clearly violates a law that bans creationism, which is what Intelligent Design is."

300.
Mark M 11 June 2015

"Address Department of Anthropology, NIU, DeKalb, IL "Intelligent Design" is creationism in disguise. It is disingenuous for its proponents to call it otherwise."

« 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... 40 »