Bell/Samsung Galaxy S i9000m is defective

We hereby petition Samsung and Bell Canada to admit publicly that there is an problem with the Samsung Galaxy S i9000M's SDCARD and state in detail how they intend to resolve the problem and for their... continue reading »

350 signatures Goal: 100
All Signatures (350 total)
276.
Charette N 28 July 2004

"2.1 bricked phone, replaced for free under 30 day period for an already upgraded 2.2 phone Number of Phones returned 1 Android OS (2.1, 2.2, Both) 2.1 Did the Bell rep acknowlege the problem? No"

277.
Adam R 21 May 2004

"I am a SaskTel customer, but use the same hardware Number of Phones returned 2 Android OS (2.1, 2.2, Both) Both Did the Bell rep acknowlege the problem? No"

278.
David A 15 May 2004
279.
Frank D 1 May 2004

"7 under 1.1 and 1 under 2.2 Number of Phones returned 8 Android OS (2.1, 2.2, Both) both Did the Bell rep acknowlege the problem? No"

280.
Mathew Hurst 26 March 2004
281.
William S 22 February 2004

"I have two of these phones and am just waiting for the second to start to have issues. I only hop it is still in the warranty period. Number of Phones returned 1 Android OS (2.1, 2.2, Both) 2.2 first release Did the Bell rep acknowlege the problem? No"

282.
Travis S 2 February 2004
283.
Frank P 7 January 2004
284.
David E 15 November 2003

"Bought from The Source, they said talk to Samsung, Samsung wouldn't talk to me, finally had to go to two different Bell stores. Get it right, people! Number of Phones returned 1 Android OS (2.1, 2.2, Both) 2.2 Did the Bell rep acknowlege the problem? No"

285.
Charlie C 2 November 2003

"With Virgin, running stock 2.2, fearing an inevitable death Number of Phones returned None YET Android OS (2.1, 2.2, Both) 2.2 Did the Bell rep acknowlege the problem? No"

286.
David W 1 November 2003

"Absolutely insane. They need to send out a recall for the faulty device Number of Phones returned 1 Android OS (2.1, 2.2, Both) 2.2 Did the Bell rep acknowlege the problem? No"

287.
Jon Romero 24 October 2003
288.
Raul Hopkins 7 October 2003

"Light-Regular user, didn't do anything strange to the phone. (No root, No lagfix, No Crazy apps, less than 20 apps) Number of Phones returned 1 Android OS (2.1, 2.2, Both) 2.2 Did the Bell rep acknowlege the problem? No"

289.
Alan H 10 September 2003

"Phones were 18 days old and should should be replaced without question. Store had only one smart phone to loan. Number of Phones returned 2 Android OS (2.1, 2.2, Both) 2.2 Did the Bell rep acknowlege the problem? No"

290.
Tony S 26 July 2003
291.
Moiz A 17 July 2003
292.
Francis G 11 July 2003

"really disappointed Number of Phones returned 1 Android OS (2.1, 2.2, Both) 2.2 Did the Bell rep acknowlege the problem? No"

293.
Jason P 19 June 2003
294.
Ryan Rush 14 June 2003
295.
Nishant B 16 May 2003

"JK4 update is very buggy Number of Phones returned 1 Android OS (2.1, 2.2, Both) Android 2.2 (JK4) Did the Bell rep acknowlege the problem? No"

296.
Doug E 11 May 2003
297.
Stephen C 31 March 2003
298.
Basil Brandt 21 March 2003
299.
Kayvan Stanley 18 March 2003

"i demand a full refund if it happens again Number of Phones returned 1 Android OS (2.1, 2.2, Both) Both Did the Bell rep acknowlege the problem? No"

300.
Kenrick D 5 March 2003
« 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 »