CFTC - Stop Leverage Change

We, the undersigned, call on the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) to reassess the proposed maximum allowed leverage put forward with RIN 3038-AC61. We traders, Forex professionals and peopl... continue reading »

450 signatures Goal: 100
All Signatures (450 total)
26.
Mary W 13 November 2015

"keep it at 100:1, or I will need to go out of U S Many jobs will be lost if it goes through. Good education is the key. Every forex trader looses money at first. I have been practicing for 2 years and finally live trade in near future. If this goes throug"

27.
David W 12 November 2015
28.
Janice D 10 November 2015
29.
Ty N 9 November 2015
30.
Natalie P 8 November 2015
31.
Sekou Jennings 6 November 2015

"why? why? why?....i understand cutting it from 400 or 300 even BUT 100?????????????????????????"

32.
James S 5 November 2015
33.
Larry J 1 November 2015

"I dont think killing jobs and incomes for tax paying citizens is is what President Obama or our other elected officials in Washington DC had in mine."

34.
Scott W 1 November 2015
35.
Adam M 28 October 2015
36.
Ronnie C 28 October 2015
37.
Robert Cc 26 October 2015

"There is no need to protect traders from themselves. 10:1 leverage will kill retail forex trading. With 100:1, traders with modest accounts around $10k can and do make steady income."

38.
Josh F 23 October 2015

"this rule does not protect the retail investor from any sort of fraud."

39.
Edward K 17 October 2015

"10:1 doesn't make any sense. More Traders will move their funds out of this country and it will be harder for the US government to collect and monitor taxes. It's a no win situation for the American People if 10:1 leverage happens. The government has no r"

40.
Michael C 15 October 2015

"100:1 = industry standard ... 10:1 = death of another US industry ... this creates a problem for the US, it doesn't solve one."

41.
Aaron J 14 October 2015
42.
Mosele Farley 12 October 2015
43.
David O 10 October 2015

"this will push all brokerages offshore if implemented"

44.
Martin L 8 October 2015

"no 10:1 please!"

45.
Alan K 5 October 2015

"100:1 is reasonable. 10:1 isn't."

46.
Brian L 3 October 2015
47.
Alin V 29 September 2015
48.
Lawrence Russell 26 September 2015

"This new rule is counter-productive and is of no value."

49.
Darrie N 23 September 2015
50.
Riezal Nash 23 September 2015
« 1 2 3 4 ... 18 »