Community Residents Against the Proposed Mega-Development on the Maryville Site at Montrose and Clarendon

We the undersigned OPPOSE the proposed Montrose/Clarendon mega-development, including the 39-story skyscraper (498 feet tall), the 30-story skyscraper (407 feet tall), the private condos on Clarendon... continue reading »

250 signatures Goal: 1,000
All Signatures (250 total)
201.
David C 19 March 2011

"I support this petition"

202.
Ellen B 17 March 2011

"I support this petition"

203.
Mike G 17 March 2011

"I support this petition"

204.
Chris R 26 February 2011

"I support this petition"

205.
Elizabeth P 25 February 2011

"I support this petition"

206.
Jan S 21 February 2011

"I am strongly opposed to this. Our family moved into the neighborhood last Fall. Altho our home is lovely, we've been grossly misled by the local government concerning a number of issues -- moreso in the last 8 months than any concerns we had in the 23 ye"

207.
Jeff S 17 February 2011

"Lakefront property doesn't need TIF money to be developed!"

208.
Edward K 13 February 2011

"I support this petition"

209.
Katharine B 2 February 2011

"There is no reason to create another TIF. Clarendon Park has always been eligible for money from the Wilson Yard TIF. Our park and Uptown families and kids are obviously a low priority for the alderman--who prefers to spend our tax dollars on parking gara"

210.
Regina B 1 February 2011

"I support this petition"

211.
Sean P 19 January 2011

"I support this petition"

212.
Bridget V 19 January 2011

"I support this petition"

213.
Karen G 6 January 2011

"I support this petition"

214.
Judy G 3 January 2011

"Why is Uptown the receiver of every bad urban planning decision ever made. Over-concentration of low income housing. Over-concentration of social service agencies. Infrastructure neglect. Public transportation neglect. And now this - a gigantic complex to"

215.
Fadyah N 31 December 2010

"I support this petition"

216.
Carol M 13 December 2010

"I support this petition"

217.
Laure H 5 December 2010

"I support this petition"

218.
Sandra R 2 December 2010

"I support this petition"

219.
Elise G 29 November 2010

"It is a travesty that Sedgwick Properties has been allowed to go this far. They are clearly an unreliable and unworthy developer for our neighborhood. We deserve to give this valuable piece of land to a worthy developer. Ideally, several developers would "

220.
James H 29 November 2010

"There was too big a difference between the plan shared with the public and what was finally prepared for the city's approval. As a tax payer in this ward, I am frustrated that this is viewed as best use of dollars during a time when police funding is cut."

221.
Dale Z 25 November 2010

"This is prime lakefront realestate, and our tax dollars do not need to subsidize this."

222.
Kathryn S 23 November 2010

"I support this petition"

223.
Ellie F 14 October 2010

"We don't need another WY"

224.
Ann George 8 September 2010

"I support this petition"

225.
Chris M 3 September 2010

"I support this petition"

« 1 ... 7 8 9 10 »