GW Clarifications and Errata
Dear Design Team,As players of Warhammer Fantasy Battles (and other GW systems) we appreciate the complexity of the rules and understand that covering every situation and answering every query is an i... continue reading »
"В"
"I think GW is great, but look at the hassle over unclear wording in the nids codex."
"None"
"A policy simmilar to this one saw limited use with a few Codecies for 3rd edition Warhammer 40,000, and worked well. I would like to see it resumed."
"В"
"В"
"It would certainly help if clarifications were presented clearly and concisely"
"I wholeheartedly agree."
"OMG, there are soo many contradictions in the rules and errata. Sometimes you can read the text over and over again and almost everytime, new interpretations can be made. PLEASE, use proper and regular english and grammar. I dont want to roll the d6 for a"
