IRS Code 6 Unanswered Questions

Sign Now
petition image
January 25, 2005

Dear Congressman, Senator, Mark Everson

(Please be advised, this letter should be brought to the attention of the Congressman personally, because your response to this letter, or failure to respond, will be permanently noted on multiple web sites (such as www.861.info) which are regularly visited by hundreds of thousands of Americans.)

As your constituent I am writing to ask for your assistance. I have enclosed six questions regarding the proper method to use to determine one's "taxable income" (for federal income tax purposes). I want to be sure what my legal responsibilities are, and I cannot determine my correct tax liability unless I have answers to these questions. I expect that as my representative you will provide me with precise, specific written answers to these questions (not a canned response which does not address the specifics).

Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Sincerely,

cc: Mark W. Everson, IRS Commissioner

1111 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20224

(P.S. I do not believe that anyone should be working for the IRS, particularly as IRS Commissioner, if he is unable or unwilling to answer these perfectly reasonable questions, which are essential to properly administering and complying with the tax laws.)

Questions Regarding Determining Taxable Income

1) Should I use the rules found in 26 USC 861(b) and 26 CFR 1.861-8 (in addition to any other pertinent sections) to determine my taxable domestic income?

2) If I should not use those sections to determine my taxable domestic income, please show where the law says who should or should not use those sections for that.

3) If I, as a U.S. citizen, receive all of my income from working within the 50 states, do 26 USC 861(b) and 26 CFR 1.861-8 show my income to be taxable?

4) Should I use 26 CFR 1.861-8T(d)(2) to determine whether my items of income (e.g. compensation, interest, rents, dividends, etc.) are excluded for federal income tax purposes?

5) What is the purpose of the list of non-exempt types of income found in 26 CFR 1.861-8T(d)(2)(iii), and why is my domestically earned income not on that list?

6) What types of income (if any) are not exempted by any statute, but are nonetheless excluded by law (not subject to the income tax) because they are, under the Constitution, not taxable by the federal government?

Reasons for questions 1 and 2:

The regulations at 26 CFR 1.861-8 begin by stating that Sections 861(b) and 863(a) state in general terms how to determine taxable income of a taxpayer from sources within the United States after gross income from the U.S. has been determined. Section 1.861-1(a)(1) confirms that taxable income from sources within the United States is to be determined in accordance with the rules of 26 USC 861(b) and 26 CFR 1.861-8 (see also 26 CFR 1.862-1(b), 1.863-1(c)). Cross-references under 26 USC 61, as well as entries in the USC Index under the heading Income Tax, also refer to Section 861 regarding income (gross and taxable) from sources within U.S.




Reason for question 3:

Section 217 of the Revenue Act of 1921, predecessor of 26 USC 861 and following, stated that income from the U.S. was taxable for foreigners, and for U.S. corporations and citizens deriving most of their income from federal possessions, but did not say the same about the domestic income of other Americans. The regulations under the 1939 Code (e.g. 29.119-1, 29.119-2, 29.119-9, 29.119-10 (1945)) showed the same thing. The current regulations at 1.861-8 still show income to be taxable only when derived from certain specific sources and activities, which still relate only to certain types of international trade (see 26 CFR 1.861-8(a)(1), 1.861-8(a)(4), 1.861-8(f)(1)).

Reason for question 4:

The regulations (26 CFR 1.861-8(a)(3)) state that a class of gross income consists of the items of income listed in 26 USC 61 (e.g. compensation, interest, rents, dividends, etc.). The regulations (26 CFR 1.861-8(b)(1)) then direct the reader to paragraph (d)(2) of the section, which provides that such classes of gross income may include some income which is excluded for federal income tax purposes.

Reason for question 5:

After defining exempt income to mean income which is excluded for federal income tax purposes (26 CFR 1.861-8T(d)(2)(ii)), the regulations list several types of income which are not exempt (i.e. which are subject to tax), including the domestic income of foreigners, certain foreign income of Americans, income of certain possessions corporations, and income of international and foreign sales corporations; but the list does not include the domestic income of most Americans (26 CFR 1.861-8T(d)(2)(iii)).

Reason for question 6:

Older income tax regulations defining gross income and net income said that neither income exempted by statute or fundamental law were subject to the tax ( 39.21-1 (1956)), and said that in addition to the types of income specifically exempted by statute, other types of income were excluded because they were, under the Constitution, not taxable by the Federal Government ( 39.22(b)-1 (1956)). (This is also reflected in the current 26 CFR 1.312-6.)
Sign The Petition
OR

If you already have an account please sign in, otherwise register an account for free then sign the petition filling the fields below.
Email and password will be your account data, you will be able to sign other petitions after logging in.

Privacy in the search engines? You can use a nickname:

Attention, the email address you supply must be valid in order to validate the signature, otherwise it will be deleted.

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services
I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy
I agree to the Personal Data Processing
Shoutbox
Sign The Petition
OR

If you already have an account please sign in

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services
I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy
I agree to the Personal Data Processing
Goal
50 signatures
Goal: 50
Latest Signatures
19 September 2015
50. Gene K | All crime is against the govmt. Isn't that crown law? CIty Savannah, Republic of Georgia Political Party Libertarian Party
11 September 2015
49. David N | I support this petition
18 August 2015
48. Timothy Ed | action required
1 April 2015
47. Lisa G | They may silence a man, but they cannot silence his ideas. CIty State College, Pa. Political Party - One Voice of the RESISTANCE -
30 March 2015
46. Nancie Booker | I support this petition
13 December 2014
45. Steven C | I support this petition
23 August 2014
44. Chas S | I support this petition
26 April 2014
43. Brad E | В CIty Troy Political Party Independant
24 January 2014
42. Beverly K | I support this petition
7 December 2013
41. Curtis Sg | I support this petition
6 May 2013
40. James Varyi | I support this petition
30 April 2013
39. Marvin Ld | I support this petition
8 December 2012
38. Renee P | I support this petition
22 August 2012
37. Paul C | Not Constitutional CIty Clay
8 May 2012
36. Alex V | I support this petition
20 March 2012
35. Charles E | lets get this taken care of CIty cary
11 March 2012
34. Marc R | I support this petition
2 November 2011
33. Robert M | В CIty В Political Party В
23 October 2011
32. Steve T | as long as these remain unanswered, there is no reason to file. Political Party Independent (Libertarian by preference)
3 September 2011
31. Lee L | I support this petition
2 September 2011
30. Ray P | I support this petition
13 July 2011
29. Keele F | I support this petition
2 July 2011
28. Carl H | I support this petition
26 March 2011
27. Darrin K | I support this petition
19 March 2011
26. David G | The irs has put a fraudulent notice of lien against me- now I see where the timothy mc vey's come from CIty Chandler, Arizona Political Party none anymore -they all suck
browse all the signatures »
Information
In: -
Petition target:
united States of America Congress, Senate,, Mark Everson,
Tags
No tags
Embed Codes
direct link
link for html
link for forum without title
link for forum with title
728×90
468×60
336×280
125×125