Jan Moir should be sacked for her homophobic comments in the Daily Mail

I am signing this petition to get Jan Moir sacked due to an article that appeared in the Daily Mail on the 15th October 2009, simultaneously online, updated online 16/10/09.Original headline "Why ther... continue reading »

1,000 signatures Goal: 5,000
All Signatures (1,000 total)
201.
Sue E 16 August 2014

"is she mad or some thing what a thing to write about a guy who had just passed away ?!?!?!?!"

202.
David R 16 August 2014

"I am in agrreement with the entire content of the attached letter"

203.
Georgia W 15 August 2014

"There is no place for homophobia in todays media Address К"

204.
Charles A 8 August 2014

"."

205.
Dianne B 7 August 2014

"Sack Jan Moir"

206.
Simone W 6 August 2014

"Sad that things like this are still being written."

207.
Karl G 6 August 2014

"She should be sacked."

208.
Michael S 29 July 2014

"Homophobes should be treated the same as racists."

209.
Laura M 27 July 2014

"apalling"

210.
Chris P 17 July 2014

"The innaccuracy and bigotry in this article should be questioned at the very least"

211.
Denise G 13 July 2014

"Don't understand exactly what she was trying to prove with her ..."

212.
Miriam C 11 July 2014

"I've been trying all weekend, and still can't put together anything coherent about why this article was so disgusting. Enough."

213.
Mark L 10 July 2014

"Vile rantings with no base in fact and a slur against the gay community as a whole"

214.
Yolanda S 10 July 2014

"This article is based on gossip and unfounded - it is a dangerous to influence the unknowing public with these"

215.
Wes T 7 July 2014

"classic daily mail."

216.
Richard Frey 5 July 2014

"n/a"

217.
Ian W 4 July 2014

"Shamefull, right wing bordering on nazi theres nothing 'mischevious' about peoples views Address Flat1 , 4 enys road bn21 2dh"

218.
Anna G 1 July 2014

"Homophobic, instrusive, disgusting"

219.
Patrick H 29 June 2014

"The article and contents must have been approved by the editor . The editor should be sacked; unless of course, these bigoted and prujudiced attitudes are the accepted view of the paper's hierarchy, in which case the paper should be under investigation"

220.
Gruffudd W 26 June 2014

"Vile and underhand, grossly insensitive."

221.
Jennifer B 26 June 2014

"I think this is offensive in the extreme. Both Jan and her editor should be made to answer for this disgusting show of ignorance."

222.
Mia E 25 June 2014

"Are we not in the 21st century now? Utterly disgusting,"

223.
Christy B 24 June 2014

"What a shame."

224.
Scott R 20 June 2014

"It is a free country, BUT she went too far."

225.
Simon D 19 June 2014

"Outrageous bigotry!"

« 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 ... 40 »