Keep FOCUS and Steve Wilent as editor

We the undersigned wish to congratulate Steve Wilent for doing an excellent job on the FOCUS section of the Journal of Forestry (JOF). This insert to the JOF has provided foresters with readable, "do... continue reading »

44 signatures Goal: 5,000
All Signatures (44 total)
1.
Richard Pellek · Coraopolis 19 December 2010

"Please keep the FOCUS and our options open. The idea of tossing out vibrant information sources is worrisome, to me. "

2.
Lee Laechelt · Helena 17 December 2010

"FOCUS contains practical information not found in the rest of the Journal of Forestry. Limit Editor Wilent to 4 pages, but do not throw out the section."

3.
Shawn Spencer · Flushing 17 December 2010

"While I understand the need for cost savings. I must agree that the FOCUS section in the JOF has become an important and usefull tool to the members, and would be underused on the website. "

4.
Ken Mc Nabb · Auburn University 16 December 2010

"FOCUS is one of few things I almost always read in the Journal."

5.
Lara Jo Gordon · Old Town 13 December 2010
6.
Jerry L. Johnson · Auburn 13 December 2010

"The Focus section is what most "

7.
Mike Finity · Hayden 13 December 2010

"Please, keep the FOCUS section of the JOF! As a field forester I find it the most useful and interesting part of the journal, and it's the section I read first."

8.
Lawrence K. Miller · Kennewick 12 December 2010
9.
don bertolette · flagstaff 12 December 2010

"Of the changes that I hear rumors of, this is the least desirable change. Please retain Steve Wilent and the FOCUS. "

10.
David Wardrop · Bangor 12 December 2010

"As a field forester, Focus has done more for me than any other section of the "

11.
Don Nearhood · Portland 12 December 2010
12.
Kent T. Holmes · Enfield 12 December 2010

"Keep the FOCUS section!"

13.
Shannon Spencer · Ctr. Strafford 12 December 2010

"This is one of the best aspects of the Journal! If you want to do away with anything, do away with the extra paper/newsletter we get!!"

14.
Jennifer Plyler · Barnesville 12 December 2010

"Please keep the FOCUS section of the JoF. It is a valuable source of information for field foresters and others looking for hands-on, practical information."

15.
Gyde Lund · Manassas 12 December 2010

"One of the more useful sections of the Journal for foresters who are still fortunate enough to work in the woods."

16.
Kris Alberga · Jay 12 December 2010

"One of the pats of JOF that I enjoy most. I hope you will reconsider its demise..."

17.
Jason Stephens · Cadillac 12 December 2010

"Please keep the FOCUS section! It has some of the most practical and useful information in the Journal, and it's one of the first places I flip to when the new issue arrives."

18.
Dick Varney · Parksville 12 December 2010

"I have found this section helpful."

19.
Stephen W. Weber · Weybridge 12 December 2010

"I urge the Journal to retain the FOCUS section."

20.
Dan Yelch · Elizabeth 11 December 2010
21.
Tom Nygren · Hillsboro 11 December 2010

"Focus is a very helpful tool for the average forester - and should not be dropped. If the situation is that drastic, drop the Journal and incorporate the Focus material into the Forestry Source, and cover the research/science Journal artcles in the region"

22.
Kent Hanby · Dadeville 11 December 2010

"This is a ligitimate vote. There are no dimples or hanging chads. "

23.
Robyn Darbyshire · Brookings 11 December 2010

"I greatly enjoy and use the FOCUS section - It's a quick read and a way to catch up on new results quickly. Please keep it - it's the part of the JOF that I read first - then I set the rest of the issue aside for later reading. "

24.
Carl Pribanic · Plano 11 December 2010

"There is a need for a diversity of opinion. It needs to include forestry and environment related ideas, concepts, opinions from both professionals inside and outside the broad field of forestry/park/wildlife and environmenal management. There will alway"

25.
Scott Crosby · Interlachen 10 December 2010

"Please keep the FOCUS section of "

« 1 2 »