Keep FOCUS and Steve Wilent as editor
We the undersigned wish to congratulate Steve Wilent for doing an excellent job on the FOCUS section of the Journal of Forestry (JOF). This insert to the JOF has provided foresters with readable, "do... continue reading »
"Please keep the FOCUS and our options open. The idea of tossing out vibrant information sources is worrisome, to me. "
"FOCUS contains practical information not found in the rest of the Journal of Forestry. Limit Editor Wilent to 4 pages, but do not throw out the section."
"While I understand the need for cost savings. I must agree that the FOCUS section in the JOF has become an important and usefull tool to the members, and would be underused on the website. "
"FOCUS is one of few things I almost always read in the Journal."
"The Focus section is what most "
"Please, keep the FOCUS section of the JOF! As a field forester I find it the most useful and interesting part of the journal, and it's the section I read first."
"Of the changes that I hear rumors of, this is the least desirable change. Please retain Steve Wilent and the FOCUS. "
"As a field forester, Focus has done more for me than any other section of the "
"Keep the FOCUS section!"
"This is one of the best aspects of the Journal! If you want to do away with anything, do away with the extra paper/newsletter we get!!"
"Please keep the FOCUS section of the JoF. It is a valuable source of information for field foresters and others looking for hands-on, practical information."
"One of the more useful sections of the Journal for foresters who are still fortunate enough to work in the woods."
"One of the pats of JOF that I enjoy most. I hope you will reconsider its demise..."
"Please keep the FOCUS section! It has some of the most practical and useful information in the Journal, and it's one of the first places I flip to when the new issue arrives."
"I have found this section helpful."
"I urge the Journal to retain the FOCUS section."
"Focus is a very helpful tool for the average forester - and should not be dropped. If the situation is that drastic, drop the Journal and incorporate the Focus material into the Forestry Source, and cover the research/science Journal artcles in the region"
"This is a ligitimate vote. There are no dimples or hanging chads. "
"I greatly enjoy and use the FOCUS section - It's a quick read and a way to catch up on new results quickly. Please keep it - it's the part of the JOF that I read first - then I set the rest of the issue aside for later reading. "
"There is a need for a diversity of opinion. It needs to include forestry and environment related ideas, concepts, opinions from both professionals inside and outside the broad field of forestry/park/wildlife and environmenal management. There will alway"
"Please keep the FOCUS section of "