Marshall Field Name Change

We, the undersigned, are citizens or visitors of the city of Chicago and we strongly oppose your decision to change the name of the landmark department store, Marshall Field & Company to Macy's. M... continue reading »

1,000 signatures Goal: 1,000
All Signatures (1,000 total)
676.
Lori M 7 August 2009
677.
Ann B 6 August 2009

"People traveling to Chicago seek out the flagship store on State Street. When they see a Macy's sign, they will assume Marshall Fields has left town. Macy's name does not carry the weight or prestige that Marshall Fields does."

678.
Margie A 2 August 2009
679.
Bob W 2 August 2009
680.
Lara O 30 July 2009
681.
Pauline C 29 July 2009

"I have been a faithful customer since I was 8 years old and have had a Regards account since 1994. Your decision is extremely disheartening to me. I urge you to reconsider as it would likely result in the loss of me as a devoted customer."

682.
A Mr 27 July 2009
683.
Marci S 26 July 2009
684.
Alicia C 19 July 2009

"It's a Chicago landmark!!!!"

685.
Deborah Z 13 July 2009

"Leave our landmarks alone. Macy's is New York and Field's is Chicago. I refuse to shop in Macy's unless I'm in New York."

686.
Beverly B 8 July 2009

"Marshall Field's is a Chicago tradition. If I wanted to shop at a NY store, I'd go to NY."

687.
Joyce K 7 July 2009
688.
Tiffany N 1 July 2009

"I will definitely not shop at "Macy's"; it's just not the same as our classic Marshall Field's in Chicago, with the Frangos, Walnut room, Christmas shopping, and the clocks....etc. They should be ashamed at their decision."

689.
Chris S 21 June 2009

"I have lived in this fine state for all my life, and growing up, Marshall Fields has been a staple of my childhood. It would cause me much grief to see it be disgraced by this new name."

690.
Justin F 20 June 2009
691.
Nicole S 19 June 2009

"Macy's means nothing in Chicago - or the midwest for that matter. I lived in Mpls for 5 years, the only time I stepped foot in Macy's there (MOA) was to get from the parking garage to the rest of the mall. Field's is Chicago tradition. Macy's should stay "

692.
James M 17 June 2009
693.
Collene W 15 June 2009

"It would be a shame for Chicago to be stripped of this bit of history in the name of corporate red tape. In a time when retail chains are producing cookie cutter cities, individuality and cultural icons are sorely needed. I truly hope Macy's will take int"

694.
Heywood J 13 June 2009

"Name change bad juju!"

695.
Chris S 13 June 2009
696.
Brian W 10 June 2009
697.
Sally J 10 June 2009

"just don't do it"

698.
Susan S 10 June 2009
699.
Jennifer C 7 June 2009
700.
Nancy K 6 June 2009
« 1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 ... 40 »