Metropolitan Place Pet Amendment

To: Metropolitan Place Board MembersWe, the undersigned, are concerned citizens of the City of Chicago. While recognizing the concerns of building residents, we are extremely concerned regarding the p... continue reading »

200 signatures Goal: 100
All Signatures (200 total)
26.
Heather T 19 June 2014
27.
Barbara K 31 May 2014

"Unit # Non-resident Discrimintation is usually due to a lack of awareness. Please do the right thing and allow this repsonsible dog owner to keep his pets and his life."

28.
Joel F 30 April 2014
29.
Adam Gthomasd 5 April 2014

"Unit # Burnham Park Animal Hospital It is the owner of the dog, not the breed of the dog, that molds its behavior."

30.
Jason R 13 March 2014

"Unit # 707 I completly support Mr. Johnson, and feel that once again our board is spending our money wrongly!"

31.
Brooke M 12 February 2014
32.
Laurier P 5 February 2014
33.
Pamela T 23 January 2014

"Unit # 725 I think it's ridiculous for Brad to lose his dogs. They are friendly well-behaved animals."

34.
Dorothy S 5 November 2013
35.
Rose P 2 November 2013
36.
Alex J 21 October 2013

"Unit # Nonresident Excluding a dog by breed is every bit as backward and wrongheaded as excluding a person by race. I hope you'll do the right thing instead of giving in to the unwarranted prejudices of a few people who are badly misinformed."

37.
Tina B 23 September 2013

"Unit # Non-resident Sad to see such ignorance. If you are going to go as far as to try to evict these animals, you should educate yourself first."

38.
Larry D 19 August 2013
39.
Rusty S 17 August 2013

"Unit # Non-Resident Please reconsider removing Brad's two pets! They are part of his family and are recieving so much praise from people in the building who have actually met and interacted with them. Don't be fooled into removing them based on breed."

40.
Ellen Martinez 11 July 2013
41.
Suzanne D 20 May 2013

"Unit # 1 I have had mnuch personal interaction w/ these 2 dogs and my 4 yr old son, Harper. There couldnt be 2 more loving and trustworthy dogs anywhere. YOU, as a board, should be ashamed of yourselves that you havent even taken the time to meet these 2"

42.
Nick Z 13 April 2013
43.
Elizabeth W 28 March 2013

"Unit # non resident breed discrimination is illegal; moreover, these animals have not done anything which would warrant the demand that they be removed."

44.
Molly C 27 February 2013
45.
Joyce T 6 January 2013

"Unit # Non- Resident How can you take an epileptic dog away from his owner..this dog is trustworthy and counting on his owner for what he needs. To take this dog away strictly for the "breed" that he is, is one of the most heartless injustices that you c"

46.
Rebecca G 10 December 2012
47.
Diane C 25 November 2012
48.
Jackie S 23 November 2012
49.
Donna M 10 November 2012

"Unit # Non resident Sydney Nova Scotia Canada All i can say is what goes around comes around. Good luck with keeping your furrkids."

50.
Susan L 23 October 2012

"Unit # non-resident please don't punish those wonderful animals for things they have not done"

« 1 2 3 4 ... 8 »