New Battery Hotel Developement

We, the undersigned, demand that the proposed Text Amendment, Number 362, 2006 to the St. Johns Development Regulations to accommodate the proposed redevelopment of The Battery Hotel site, not be ente... continue reading »

781 signatures Goal: 100
All Signatures (781 total)
526.
Annette Manningt 19 May 2009

"I support this petition"

527.
Dr Annakearneyg 18 May 2009

"Although I live in Paradise, I feel the Signal Hill area belongs to all of us. It is part of our provincial heritage. We should all be concerned. Whatever development goes there should be in keeping with the historical and cultural significance of the lan"

528.
Patrick D 11 May 2009

"I support this petition"

529.
Kevin P 10 May 2009

"В"

530.
Leslie S 29 April 2009

"Although no longer a permanent resident of St John's, I continue to come home; and have convinced many Australian friends to make the trip as well... environmentally sensitive development that doesn't destroy this very unique place is the way to go!"

531.
Kevin M 23 April 2009

"Enough of the double standard. If you are not going to make EVERYONE follow the process then the process is useless."

532.
Cindy H 15 April 2009

"I support this petition"

533.
Doug H 9 April 2009

"dont do it."

534.
Nicole T 9 April 2009

"I am not opposed to development of the Battery area. However, the structure is not in keeping with the integrity and character of the city of St. John's. I hope that all care and consideration will be given to the residents of St. John's when making any f"

535.
Mary Vant 31 March 2009

"В"

536.
Chris D 15 March 2009

"Our city should not be controlled by profit! Developement must take place in the best interests of the citizens of St. John's not the dollar."

537.
Elaine T 2 March 2009

"I support this petition"

538.
Josh C 2 March 2009

"Another eyesore for the City Of St. John's! Great thinking council! Doc, you know better than this!"

539.
Peter H 21 February 2009

"Don't do it!"

540.
Joanne M 20 February 2009

"I am very distrubed that the Council would consider such a developed for the Outter Battery and that they would ignore the guidelines on the battery which they had approved in June. I believe very much in following processes and certainly if a process is "

541.
Richard W 16 February 2009

"Stick to the Guidelines"

542.
Carol L 14 February 2009

"I support this petition"

543.
Sharon H 13 February 2009

"The proposed hotel is totally out of character for this proposed site"

544.
Doug H 13 February 2009

"I support this petition"

545.
Karen T 13 February 2009

"I support this petition"

546.
Ursula K 19 January 2009

"I support this petition"

547.
Julia E 19 January 2009

"Signal Hill is a National Historic Site of Canada and should be given the respect it deserves! Development for profit is NOT ACCEPTABLE nor does Signal Hill have the infrastructure to support that kind of major traffic!"

548.
Terri W 18 January 2009

"Regulations and guidelines should be for everyone, not only for those without political pull, otherwise what is the point?"

549.
Marilyn D 13 January 2009

"I support this petition"

550.
Antoinette S 11 January 2009

"This proposed change to the city's own regulations lays the foundation for a future in which both the built heritage and the natural features of St. John's can be forever held hostage to the whims of tax hungry city councillors and the developers who bene"

« 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 ... 32 »