No more sexy women in advertising

A big part of the problem with the modern world is material overconsumption. And I feel that a big driver of this material overconsumption is that consumerism is so heavily linked to sex in males' sub... continue reading »

116 signatures Goal: 50,000
All Signatures (116 total)
101.
Christine Wagner · Butler 26 February 2010
102.
Jennifer · Memphis 25 February 2010
103.
Michelle Sinko · South Lyon 24 February 2010

"Good idea!"

104.
Menezes · Bethesda 17 February 2010
105.
JQ LAcy · St. Louis 11 February 2010

"unfortunatly, sex sells. yet, what are we teaching our society? that is it okay to lust? Sex is not only used for men but it is also used on women. So many companies cross the line. Esp. Victoria's Secret and Abercombie&Fitch. I thought they were selling"

106.
Inessa Vishnevkine · Brooklyn 29 January 2010
107.
Robbie · Olympia 23 January 2010

"Women are not commodities to be used to satisfy male fantasies."

108.
AB · Columbus 18 January 2010

"This is GREAT!! I think it's hilarious and yet soberly real at the same time. "

109.
Des · Toronto 15 January 2010

"Yes, I agree. But also they should not be using it because a lot of women look at them and think that they are the perfect woman and this causes anoxeria and bulimia."

110.
Lucia De La Cruz · Sacramento 12 January 2010

"I think that they should have more normal looking people in advertisments! (at least in most of them!)"

111.
Marissa · Orlando 12 January 2010
112.
FROG · Boston 9 January 2010

"Go to hell."

113.
Brooke Folkerth · Dayton 9 January 2010
114.
Virginia Carlson · Minneapolis 4 January 2010
115.
Amy Sheppard · Bristol, England 3 January 2010

"I agree with you. It's discusting to know that it's all over the net!!!"

116.
Joe give me a blow · Fuck 2 January 2010

"Yes, I am a man and frankly, I don't care for these advertisements. Sexy women don't make us decide to buy something. I am not as naive as you might think, bitch. I am sure that you have seen the generic and widely accepted form of the man. It seems that "

« 1 ... 3 4 5 »