No to Channel 4 Maddie Documentary
To Channel 4:I oppose your plans to make a documentary reconstruction of the claim by Dr Gerald and Dr Kate McCann that their 3-year-old daughter was abducted in Portugal on 3 May 2007 continue reading »
"Ita is blindingly obvious that the parents are lying. At the very least they should be charged with neglect. I am outraged at the way these despicable people are indulged and raised to sainthood by a craven press. I hope that justice is served, and soon."
"The British people would welcome an investigative documentary that examines the police files on the case and the many contradictions and changes in the statements the McCanns and their friends made to the police; the police files are in the public domain."
"Justice for Madeleine."
"Why dosen't someone feel for Maddy and stop pittying Kate and |gerry they are responsable for leaving them"
"Totally object to having the abduction 'theory' force-fed to the general public unless ALL other posibilities to the disapearence receive equal 'show-time'."
"I think we do a further injustice to Madeleine McCann by only allowing one hypothesis to be explored. "She was abducted". We are repeatedly fed stage managed productions of this one hypothesis by the McCanns whilst other hypotheses are rubbished and shut "
"The PJ should now ask them AGAIN to take part in an official reconstruction. They didn't do it when asked the last time, but they can agree to do it now. Can't they?"
"Kate & Gerry McCann have from day 1 sought to control the information released to the public and this is the ultimate insult to our collective intelligence answer the questions kate"
"If they wanted a reconstruction why did they refuse the official police one.More propaganda from the mccanns"
"Hey "Pro" McCanns, keep posting your silly , jeez your DUMB..no matter what you write here you are still BUMPING THE NUMBERS, haha. Channel 4 wont read them, they,ll just look at how many people have signed, you dumbos! Keep them coming, thanks for adding"
"is channel four really calling it a 'documentary'? is it based on facts then? or do facts not matter when it's the Mccanns involved? how do the Mccanns know it was an 'abduction'? they weren't there. i am concerned that this is allowed to be show as a fac"
"If we can not see amarals docu.why should we sit watching this pair of twats."
"I know I shouldn't have wasted more police time with my tails of woes but it woz not me what was posting on blogs or newspaper comment sections. They should be out catching stalkers and axe murderers and paypal money stealers and things like that, not lis"
"They are guilty"
