"NO" to Section 203(k) in H.R.3837

We believe to be true that Section 203(k) in H.R.3837 will invalidate 12 U.S.C. 3351(d) which states: (not to)"exclude a certified or licensed appraiser for consideration for an assignment solely by v... continue reading »

250 signatures Goal: 1,000
All Signatures (250 total)
226.
Victor L 8 October 2011
227.
Tony C 8 October 2011
228.
L A 2 October 2011

"Licensed appraisers are competent&ethical City, State Oxford, MS"

229.
Jim Mackelburgsraasai 19 September 2011
230.
Paul C 17 September 2011
231.
Jeff D 15 September 2011
232.
Jennifer Op 31 August 2011
233.
Janina S 22 August 2011
234.
Michelle P 19 August 2011
235.
Harry Santiagoj 17 August 2011
236.
Thomas Ac 8 August 2011

"This is a terrible yet typical commentary on the Appraisal Insitutes insatiable intent to dominate all appraisal practice! City, State St. Petersburg, FL"

237.
Thomas Rkrutulisi 16 July 2011
238.
Ali S 14 July 2011

"We can hardly do business as is, I'm not cutting anyone a dime of what I make. City, State Fort Lauderdale, FL"

239.
Claudia S 12 July 2011
240.
Thomas Rl 20 June 2011
241.
Ronald Tracyb 13 June 2011
242.
Geri L 5 June 2011
243.
Paul T 18 May 2011
244.
John R 10 May 2011
245.
David R 23 April 2011
246.
John Pc 19 April 2011
247.
Robert Hr 3 April 2011

"No to 203(K) in H.R.3837 City, State Lutz, Florida"

248.
Mario G 26 March 2011
249.
Stewart L 25 March 2011
250.
Grant S 5 March 2011

"Vote No City, State Sacramento"

« 1 ... 8 9 10 »