Offsite linking on Neopets.com

Recently, a new rule was put into affect at Neopets.com that bans users from offsite linking on their petpages, guilds, shops etc. With the implementation of this rule, nearly all of the most creative... continue reading »

500 signatures Goal: 1,000
All Signatures (500 total)
376.
Lani J 1 January 2006

"Username krcha THis is a very underthought rule, that needs to be removed."

377.
Alee Yesthatshowispelli 12 December 2005

"I support this petition"

378.
Dragon K 14 November 2005

"this is stupid,cruel and utterluy INCORRECT!by preventing out-site linking many Good things will go adios...like music,backgrounds,Time Saving Thumbnails....must i name even more to make my point?"

379.
Kelly Buckley 6 November 2005

"Username xxmuttyxx My GAWSH,put the dang outside linking back...Otherwise neopets will drive away every last artist,as if they aren't sparse enough ._. +le sigh+"

380.
Switt Collier 4 November 2005

"I support this petition"

381.
Aki Ferrell 11 October 2005

"Username Nestly52 The neopets team made this rule to protect us from scammers and such, but comeon! If your that stupid to fall for that stuff then it's your own fault for being fooled!"

382.
Faith Camacho 9 October 2005

"Username gerbil_girl783 This rule is stupid! How are all of us supposed to make our petpages creatively without linking to other webpages!? I can't have an art gallery anymore! This sucks! If someone is linking to a bad site then freeze THEM don't take a"

383.
Alex Solomon 9 October 2005

"Username chibivash_140 This rule is the worst yet! I hope this petition gets enough signatures. I'm tired of this rule. Go Nikki!"

384.
Ari Leach 8 October 2005

"Username Adarial I totally agree. This rule is such a bummer."

385.
Mary Novak 2 October 2005

"Username devilish_blood What's wrong about having off-neo links on the site? NOTHING! People are losing their creativity becuase of this dumb rule! Just because it's an off-neo link doesn't mean that it will effect the whole site! Ok, maybe it will if mo"

386.
Darrius S 2 September 2005

"i don't know what this is... but i'll sign it anyways"

387.
Jeanelle Stephens 14 August 2005

"I support this petition"

388.
Kage Bradshaw 2 August 2005

"I support this petition"

389.
Ankh B 30 July 2005

"I support this petition"

390.
Dowzie Kent 29 July 2005

"Username Dowzerdee This is getting utterly pathetic! Neopets are beccomming paranoid now. If their not careful, I can guarantee they will loose members. First they ban the right click off our petpages, so artists can't even protect their work! Now they'r"

391.
Caitlin M 7 July 2005

"I support this petition"

392.
Maria Clayton 1 July 2005

"Username _dragon_eye This is un fair to people who lend out pictures, minis, html, etc. Things will go unclaimed and stolen."

393.
Gem Mclean 27 June 2005

"Username gemstarmew WOW! that is so wrong, think about how much your hindering users creativity. No art thumbnails, no websets/backgrounds graphics from sites (because you have to have links back of course) the only upside i can see is that it would hind"

394.
Liz Keller 23 May 2005

"Evil rule XP"

395.
Bob Bryant 21 May 2005

"You Signed your Own Petition? Now that's just sad. Oh, and My petpage is fine. I dont see what you are on about."

396.
Mimitia Dependingonwhereyouknowmef 21 May 2005

"Username Kutie_Girl889, 0dessy, quite a few others o.o; I think it's pretty much ridiculous about the offsite linking--now I'll have to re-do over 6 petpages just because of this, and even though Neo's trying to protect us from whatever's out there, it's"

397.
Jennifer Rocha 19 May 2005

"Username orieyl I completely agree. It's a ridiculous rule, one which I hope will be removed. As long as the privilage is not abused, and don't see why it would cause a problem."

398.
Ona Ayers 12 May 2005

"I support this petition"

399.
Hanna Clark 1 May 2005

"I support this petition"

400.
Ree Maynard 30 April 2005

"OI! Down with the rule!"

« 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 ... 20 »