Oppose GGNRA Draft Dog Management Plan

CC:Jon Jarvis, Director, National Park ServiceFrank Dean, Superintendent, GGNRAChristine Lehnertz, Pacific West Regional Director, NPSU.S. Senator Dianne FeinsteinU.S. Senator Barbara BoxerU.S. Congre... continue reading »

1,000 signatures Goal: 10,000
All Signatures (1,000 total)
976.
Larry T 8 July 2013

"People with dogs are very considerate and new regulations are not needed. City, Zip San Francisco, 94110"

977.
Clif J 7 July 2013

"I support this petition"

978.
Jeanne B 6 July 2013

"y"

979.
Catherine C 6 July 2013

"I support this petition"

980.
Priscilla M 30 June 2013

"I support this petition"

981.
Ben W 29 June 2013

"Dog owners in the Bay Area already have limited options for off leash dog walking since it's forbidden in state and national parks. Reducing the remaining space will add conflict and pressure at city parks and the very minimal remaining space we have left"

982.
Beverly M 29 June 2013

"I support this petition"

983.
Maya B 28 June 2013

"I support this petition"

984.
Amber W 26 June 2013

"I support the petition to oppose limiting dog-walking access throughout the GGNRA lands. Much of the land was donated with the express contingency that it be used for practical and recreational use by the community, which has historically included walking"

985.
James D 25 June 2013

"Keep our 1\% of GGNRA for full recreational use. Don't limit use and go against your very own charter City, Zip San Francisco, CA 94121"

986.
Russell U 25 June 2013

"В City, Zip san francisco 94103"

987.
Ann W 22 June 2013

"I support this petition"

988.
Jacob M 22 June 2013

"I am a citizen of SF county and have used the beaches and oppose this measure to enforce such limited access for dogs. City, Zip San Francisco, 94122"

989.
Julienne C 22 June 2013

"1. San Francisco is becoming more populated and dense, making the GGNRA lands close to the City more essential than ever as recreational outlets for residents. 2. Urban dog ownership is a somewhat new need not being adequately addressed by the Parks Servi"

990.
Peggy C 21 June 2013

"The emphasis should be on educating dog owners to be responsible for cleaning-up after their dogs, not taking away the rights of dog owners. Please allow us to continue to run our dogs and be responsible owners. City, Zip Novato, Ca 94949"

991.
Bryan P 20 June 2013

"I support this petition"

992.
Sarah W 20 June 2013

"I support this petition"

993.
Britta S 20 June 2013

"I support this petition"

994.
Sandy J 20 June 2013

"I live in this high priced area to use Crissy & Ft. Funston with my dog! PLEASE dont take our everyday life away!! City, Zip 94115"

995.
Amber P 20 June 2013

"I support this petition"

996.
Carol B 18 June 2013

"Dogs need to be walked, and they love parks, and I love dogs."

997.
Wendy U 18 June 2013

"I support this petition"

998.
Marina B 18 June 2013

"I support this petition"

999.
Elisabeth P 17 June 2013

"Please, Dogs have rights City, Zip 94114"

1000.
Holly M 15 June 2013

"I support this petition"

« 1 ... 38 39 40 »