Oppose PG&E's C3ETP
Sign Now
We the people who love the Sierra Nevada foothills oppose, with the exception of re-conductoring (restringing) existing tower lines, any version of the Central California Clean Energy Transmission Project, constructed by any utility or by any utility's contractors, routed through or anywhere in the foothills of the California Sierra Nevada range.
The reasons for our opposition to this project are as follows:
1. Negative impact on the foothill environment and cultural resources;
2. Degradation of the visual beauty, vistas, and/or views;
3. Negative impact on our property values;
4. Negative impact on our quality of life;
5. Negative impact on our health;
6. Negative impact for visitors who come not only from Fresno County and California but from all over the world each year to visit our beautiful area.
We support clean and green energy generation that does not negatively impact ecosystems and/or land owners through eminent domain.
The reasons for our opposition to this project are as follows:
1. Negative impact on the foothill environment and cultural resources;
2. Degradation of the visual beauty, vistas, and/or views;
3. Negative impact on our property values;
4. Negative impact on our quality of life;
5. Negative impact on our health;
6. Negative impact for visitors who come not only from Fresno County and California but from all over the world each year to visit our beautiful area.
We support clean and green energy generation that does not negatively impact ecosystems and/or land owners through eminent domain.
Sign The Petition
Continue with Google
OR
If you already have an account please sign in, otherwise register an account for free then sign the petition filling the fields below.
Email and password will be your account data, you will be able to sign other petitions after logging in.
Shoutbox
Goal
100 signatures
Goal: 1,000
Latest Signatures
24 October 2015
100.
Ron D
|
This project needs to balance the needs of our disappearing natural environment, the ratepaying public,and not only the profit of the utility monopoly!
28 August 2015
99.
Jay H
|
I totally agree with the petition and I would like to add that I don't believe that PG&E has been completely forthcoming in providing information to the affected landowners in the proposed project area.
12 July 2015
1 July 2015
20 June 2015
11 June 2015
3 June 2015
4 May 2015
4 April 2015
19 March 2015
19 March 2015
17 January 2015
17 December 2014
17 October 2014
14 October 2014
25 September 2014
19 September 2014
84.
David C
|
This Valley cannot sustain unconstrained growth, especially with the prospect of climate change looming. Ramping up the infrastructure is geared toward the kind of growth that will be detrimental to the entire area.
31 July 2014
7 July 2014
27 June 2014
29 May 2014
27 May 2014
8 May 2014
3 April 2014
10 March 2014
Tags
No tags
Embed Codes
direct link
link for html
link for forum without title
link for forum with title
