Oppose recognition of any province as a nation

We, the undersigned Canadians, oppose recognition of any province as a 'nation,' and call on our elected representatives to work instead for a united, equal Canada. continue reading »

850 signatures Goal: 100
All Signatures (850 total)
551.
C H 15 April 2009
552.
Elliot P 5 April 2009
553.
Richard Em 5 April 2009
554.
Noel C 28 March 2009

"It is dangerous, bordering on a betrayal of the equality provisions of the Charter we hold so dearly, to formally grant "nation" status to any province within our federation, as well as being repugnant to the values of tolerance and pluralism which define"

555.
Matt G 24 March 2009
556.
Donald Fc 18 March 2009

"It didn't work any of the other times it's been tried, nor would it now; it's still empty politicking."

557.
Carol M 12 March 2009
558.
W A 9 March 2009
559.
Martin I 7 March 2009
560.
Terry M 27 February 2009

"В"

561.
Mark H 21 February 2009
562.
Ken Y 21 February 2009

"I thought that a Conservative government would act that way..."

563.
Glen K 20 February 2009
564.
Chad H 18 February 2009

"As a Canadian with a deep and profound love of my country, the greatest in the world, I passionately urge the elected representatives of all Canadians to oppose the idea that Quebec is a nation. Stephen Harper and the far-right Neoconservatives are intent"

565.
Trevor C 13 February 2009

"ANY MP who votes for this won't get my vote. I promise. And I keep my promises."

566.
Ramseytroughton Wood 13 February 2009

"В"

567.
Quito M 11 February 2009
568.
Carl H 3 February 2009

"I am so sick and tired of Canadian tax dollars being used to fan the "Quebec Question." The province of Quebec is a bloodsucker and could/would not survive without Federal transfer payments. I feel Quebec should separate, if only to demonstrate the folly "

569.
Cory G 31 January 2009

"В"

570.
John L 31 January 2009
571.
Emily H 30 January 2009
572.
Caleigh M 26 January 2009

"This recognition is a dangerous game of political opportunism that comes at the expense of national unity. It is a recognition based on appeasement, pandering and ignorance of its impacts."

573.
Wendy G 21 January 2009
574.
Peggy A 20 January 2009
575.
Brent Jn 17 January 2009
« 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 ... 34 »