All Signatures (127 total)
76.
Jerry Dowdy · Scotts Valley 10 December 2010

"If you want painted ponies , the P.O.A. registry has lots of them."

77.
Jean D. Greenlee · Trappe 10 December 2010
78.
Sally Davidson · Gilman City 10 December 2010
79.
Patricia Holmes · Woodside 10 December 2010

"This is an important issue and I feel very strongly about it. I thinlk there are alternatives like the section X in the UK"

80.
madison voss · Wilton 10 December 2010
81.
Irene Harvey · Shingle Springs 10 December 2010

"We should NOT change the rules for registration that has been in effect for over 100 years, let's keep the Welsh standard the way it is and protect the breed."

82.
Tammy Friedrich · Commiskey 9 December 2010
83.
Carolyn Guinotte · Olympia WA 9 December 2010

"Enough changes have been made to the Welsh pony breed standard (height) and this is just one more change we, as Welsh breeders, owners,lovers, could well do without."

84.
bethany · coventry 9 December 2010
85.
Belinda Meyers · Killingworth 9 December 2010

"The manner in which this rule change was implemented was shady and underhanded. Never was the membership polled or even informed that a vote was to take place. This change was recommended by a few who undoubtedly stand to gain from it. To say I'm disappo"

86.
Lynnette Tu · Houston 19 February 2010
87.
Daniel Philpott · Rochester 14 February 2010

"Keep the beautiful Welsh as they are and keep the GYPSY LOOKING ponies out. It will definitely cheapen the breed in the long run."

88.
Thomas McColl · Leipzig, Germany 13 February 2010

"am a WPSCA member for "06"

89.
laurie gowland · Bedford 7 February 2010
90.
Nancy McColl · Southern Pines 7 February 2010
91.
Pamela Schaaf · Azle 6 February 2010

"Changing the standard should not be taken lightly. It is there for a reason and to let mis-marked ponies in to the pure registry is a big mistake. The Arabian reg. has the right idea. Check out how they handled the problem."

92.
charles shirley · 11516 soldier creek rd, burlingame, 4 February 2010
93.
Anna Hill · Denham Springs 3 February 2010

"I think that the standard should be maintained. If another section of the stud book needs to be made as in the UK with section X, then that should be taken care of, but all colors should not accepted or the original breed standard and type will be comprom"

94.
C. Sykes · Springtown 2 February 2010

"The insane craze for pinto individuals in this country is resulting in the loss of strong solid-color bloodlines in what were once predominantly solid breeds. It's getting almost impossible to find a solid colored Shetland or Miniature, for example. Allo"

95.
Phillip R. Baker · 2286 FM 1457 New Ulm 2 February 2010

"Reinstate Rule #6 The board seems to have rushed into something with out input from the WHOLE Member/breeders. Looks a bit like self serving and conflect of instrest. "

96.
Barb Curnow · Nampa 31 January 2010

"I am against the recent rule change to now allow pinto welsh ponies full registration papers without the addition of a seperate registry. The "Clinton" type verbage used to support this change as in "We are not changing the standard, just the registration"

97.
Donald J. Schmidt · Greenville 26 January 2010

"Thank you for taking the initiative to repeal this ill advised change in the rules"

98.
Carol Burdick · Terra Alta 26 January 2010
99.
Teresa Glass /Glass View Farm · Natural Bridge Station 25 January 2010
100.
Penny Dennehy · Barrington 25 January 2010

"I agree"

« 1 2 3 4 5 6 »