PETITION TO DENY PERMITS FOR TRANSPORT OF MASSIVELY OVERSIZED EQUIPMENT ON U.S. HIGHWAY 12

We, the undersigned, strongly oppose the issuance of permits to Exxon Mobil/Imperial Oil, Conoco Phillips and other corporations to transport massively oversized, road-obstructing industrial equipment... continue reading »

1,000 signatures Goal: 5,000
All Signatures (1,000 total)
551.
Cynthia Andersonr 2 April 2013

"YOU MUST DENY THE PERMITS!"

552.
Meleah M 1 April 2013
553.
Jeff S 26 March 2013
554.
Susan S 26 March 2013
555.
Sandy L 25 March 2013

"Save our wilderness"

556.
Paula C 17 March 2013

"we should not be making things easy for big oil"

557.
Laurie S 16 March 2013

"This proposal is unsafe for such a heavily used road. What are the emergency plans should a spill occur along/into a river or other body of water?"

558.
Colleen L 15 March 2013
559.
Raora H 13 March 2013

"The governor's assertion that U.S. Hwy. 12 was designed as an industrial route is missing the point that it was designed for nothing larger than a logging truck. To haul loads of this massive size and weight is absurd for the structural integrity of this "

560.
Samuel Davidb 12 March 2013
561.
Clara E 11 March 2013
562.
Shirley S 11 March 2013
563.
Jay Ch 9 March 2013
564.
Jonas K 3 March 2013
565.
Kelly P 1 March 2013
566.
Sharon K 28 February 2013

"We've traveled this stretch of Hwy 12. Don't let these gigantic truck loads of tar sands processing modules headed for Alberta ruin this Scenic Byway."

567.
Roger L 28 February 2013
568.
Jayne W 27 February 2013

"Ludicrous!!!"

569.
Claudia F 25 February 2013

"On Paper, this road looks like a good option. In reality, it is definitely not an option at all."

570.
Keri C 24 February 2013
571.
Christie H 23 February 2013
572.
David R 21 February 2013
573.
Terry P 21 February 2013
574.
Deanna E 17 February 2013
575.
Barbara B 15 February 2013

"В"

« 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 ... 40 »