PROH-LA Opposes NELA Open Space ICO: Remove Private Properties

Sign Now
petition image
June 17, 2005


COUNCILMEMBER and MAYOR-ELECT ANTONIO VILLARIAGOSA
OFFICE FOURTENTH COUNCIL DISTRICT
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
City Hall 4th Floor Room 425
200 North Spring Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012


RE: Council File No. 04-1880
Opposition Letter to Proposed NELA Open Space ICO


Dear CD14 Councilmember and Mayor-elect Antonio Villaraigosa:


PROH-LA is a Coalition of Los Angeles City stakeholders and professionals advocating for responsible growth, education, and protection of hillside property owners' rights for development compatible with surrounding neighborhood standards. PROH-LA works to protect the future of our properties, local communities, businesses and workers. And, it works to ensure that we are included in LA City land use/planning public policy deliberations and debate.

WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, are strongly opposed to ANY language contained within the proposed Northeast Hillside Open Space ICO (Moratorium) No. 04-1880 that includes PRIVATE PROPERTIES in the regulatory language.

We ask that you and the other LA City elected officials focus, instead, on more immediate needs in our Northeast LA communities (and across the City), for instance reducing crime, addressing affordable housing needs, growing businesses, increasing employment, street improvements, and balancing the City of Los Angeles budget. Often neglected, Northeast LA is in dire need of your attention to these urgent problems.

The proposed ICO is bad public policy. It responds to and benefits a privileged few in Northeast LA at the expense of the numerous ethnic/racial minority, middle-class residents, businesses, landowners and workers as well as those supporting the professional fields of construction, real estate, and labor.

WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, urge you to reconsider your support for the proposed Northeast Hillside Open Space Interim Control Ordinance (No. 04-1880). DO NOT allow PRIVATE PROPERTIES to be included in the proposed ICO regulatory language. But DO make sure we are involved in all the ICO discussions.




Sign The Petition
OR

If you already have an account please sign in, otherwise register an account for free then sign the petition filling the fields below.
Email and password will be your account data, you will be able to sign other petitions after logging in.

Privacy in the search engines? You can use a nickname:

Attention, the email address you supply must be valid in order to validate the signature, otherwise it will be deleted.

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services
I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy
I agree to the Personal Data Processing
Shoutbox
Sign The Petition
OR

If you already have an account please sign in

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services
I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy
I agree to the Personal Data Processing
Goal
50 signatures
Goal: 100
Latest Signatures
10 September 2015
50. Robert Bl | I support this petition
23 July 2015
49. Matt C | I support this petition
5 May 2015
48. Richard H | I support this petition
28 April 2015
47. Romualdo C | I support this petition
23 July 2014
46. Kenneth Richardi | I support this petition
20 July 2014
45. Oscar M | I stongly oppose the ICO zipcode 90032 Type of Stakeholder Land owner
13 June 2014
44. Ed R | I support this petition
9 April 2014
43. Yuling T | I support this petition
8 March 2014
42. Robert O | I support this petition
22 November 2013
41. Mildred G | No to ICO
8 May 2013
40. Linda Z | No to the ICO zipcode 90065 Type of Stakeholder Work in Glassell Park
25 March 2013
39. Marshall D | I support this petition
13 March 2013
38. Cynthia C | I support this petition
9 March 2013
37. Richard S | I support this petition
1 December 2012
36. Pat R | I support this petition
10 October 2012
35. Sarahflesh Pham | I support this petition
11 September 2012
34. Christopher Waters | I think that "Open Space" is important and should continue to be supported, however there is no need to put a freeze on development and potentially forbid a land owner from the rights they bought when they paid for that piece of land. By doing so, you are
13 August 2012
33. Susan C | Wise Growth Policies are needed in these targeted areas. zipcode 91103 Type of Stakeholder Realtor working with Los Angeles Developers
15 February 2012
32. Michele S | take responsibility for this issue Type of Stakeholder home owner
17 November 2011
31. Edgardo B | no to the I.C.O zipcode 90065 Type of Stakeholder Land Owner
8 October 2011
30. James M | I think that you should have lost - Your' a liar just like the rest of the polititions!!!!!
15 August 2011
29. Daniel D | I support this petition
24 June 2011
28. Reuben Mt | I support this petition
27 February 2011
27. Amador Hs | Fairness First zipcode 90039 Type of Stakeholder Business Owner & Commercial Property Owner
22 December 2010
26. Elliott F | Please don't take away our jobs and cause home prices to go up even further. Please don't be the mayor who helps the rich get richer and forgets about his original working supporters. zipcode 90023
browse all the signatures »
Information
In: -
Petition target:
LA City Councilmember and Mayor-elect Antonio Villaraigosa
Tags
No tags
Embed Codes
direct link
link for html
link for forum without title
link for forum with title
728×90
468×60
336×280
125×125