Restore the Pledge, Restore America

We are opposed to the ruling by the Ninth Circuit court of appeals outlawing the Pledge of Allegiance because of the generic phrase under God. This is both an assault on the free exercise of religion and on free speech. We are offended at the courts statement that the decision should stand, not because of careful review, but because they wish to assert their independence from the will of the American people. They have said that they will exercise their independence and will not be influenced by the public.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is the most overturned Circuit in the United States. The Ninth Circuit has entertained such cases as giving Federal Agents immunity to assassinate American Citizens on American soil [FN1]; the US Supreme Court has stated that a Judge, committing fraud against a person in court (which could NOT have been done except by a judge), had immunity and could not be pursued for his crime [FN2]; or another case where a prosecutor was given immunity for setting up a person in court by using false testimony and preventing evidence that might clear him at trial [FN3].

As a result of the out of control Ninth Circuit, as well as court rulings granting immunity to place judges and officials above the law, we propose the following Constitutional Amendment.

PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT

No judicial body within the United States, whether state or federal, shall render any decision against the Pledge of Allegiance to the United States, the National Motto In God We Trust, the phrase God Bless America or any similar symbols, phrases, or historical references to our Nations founding which invoke references to God. Judicial defiance of the American people has made this amendment necessary, therefore all judges, whether state or federal, shall be subjected to any and all laws, at any time as all other citizens of the United States and shall no longer enjoy any status relating to immunity or any other special treatment.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[FN1] Early on, a 3 judge panel granted FBI sniper, Lon Horiuchi immunity for what amounts to an assassination. Later, an 11 judge panel, in a SPLIT 6-5 decision said he did NOT have immunity. Five judges in the Ninth Circuit believe government assassinations of Americans are part of the job and deserve immunity! Idaho v. Horiuchi, 98-30149; The Idaho Spokesman Review. 9th Circuit Rules Murder Ok If It's Doing Your Job. July 26, 2000 Betsy Z. Russell
[FN2] "All defendants moved to dismiss, the judge asserting judicial immunity. The District Court concluded that because the injunction [i.e. CRIME COMMITTED] was a judicial act within the jurisdiction of the state court, the judge was immune from liability ... Whether or not the injunction had issued as the result of a corrupt [CRIMINAL] conspiracy." Dennis v. Sparks, 449 U.S. 24, 25-26 (1980)
[FN3] A prosecutor "knowingly used false testimony and suppressed material evidence at petitioner's trial". Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976) The prosecutor in this case was granted immunity by a judge so that he could not be held accountable to the same laws as everyone else.