RoHS lead in solders ban removal

I believe that the lead in solders removal as legislated under the RoHS EU directive is environmentally damaging, and that the exemption applied for by RoHSUSA On 20 May 2006 by John Burke, CEO RoHSUS... continue reading »

250 signatures Goal: 100
All Signatures (250 total)
176.
Roger B 2 December 2008

"В"

177.
Steven S 22 November 2008

"I support this petition"

178.
William Jr 18 November 2008

"I support this petition"

179.
William Rb 29 October 2008

"I believe there is no better solution to soldering available that will improve the environmental impact or reliability better than eutectic SN/Pb based solders. The science required has not been performed to back up the case that lead in solder causes any"

180.
Drew M 20 September 2008

"The intention was good but it is clear that the initiative needs to be revised based on new data"

181.
Steve K 30 August 2008

"I support this petition"

182.
Oliver B 22 August 2008

"No SnPb ban without a good reason!"

183.
Shawn A 20 August 2008

"В"

184.
Haldor H 4 August 2008

"В"

185.
Matt T 25 July 2008

"rohs may well make everything much worse lets control what we have rather that bringing in "safe" technology. with more substantial evidence against leaded equipment rohs would appear more benificial but evidence pressented appears to support claims leade"

186.
Branislav K 17 July 2008

"I support this petition"

187.
Wolfe M 15 July 2008

"Having used lead-free solder, I have found my product to be extremely unreliable, with failures occuring within weeks, instead on the 50 + years they are designed to last. Imagine millions upon millions of used up, failed electronics due to ROHS complianc"

188.
L C 8 July 2008

"I support this petition"

189.
Steve M 16 June 2008

"Hmm, let's see... brittle solder joints, tin wiskers - the big screen TV, iPod, and computer will now go into the landfill after ~2 years instead of maybe 6 years... It must be good for the environment..."

190.
Dennis Ap 26 April 2008

"Bad, Bad news! I don't believe what I have read."

191.
James Pw 18 April 2008

"I support this petition"

192.
David T 31 March 2008

"I support this petition"

193.
Mike L 27 March 2008

"I support this petition"

194.
Orin L 27 March 2008

"Give physics priority over politics"

195.
Thomas B 11 March 2008

"I'm a components engineer. This RoHS conversion has consumed most of my work time for the last year and will into the next year. If this is going to cause more harm than good, what a waste! Reliabilty is crucial for our company's product. We can't afford "

196.
Allen Hb 6 March 2008

"I support this petition"

197.
Sheri Elliotth 1 March 2008

"I support this petition"

198.
Geoff T 22 February 2008

"I support this petition"

199.
Wayne M 20 February 2008

"I support this petition"

200.
James Hawleyirwinj 24 January 2008

"I support this petition"

« 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 »