Save Mapledurham Playing Fields

SAY NO TO THE SALE OF MAPLEDURHAM PLAYING FIELDS BY READING BOROUGH COUNCILWe, the undersigned, do hereby strongly object to any proposals by Reading Borough Council or by any other Trustee, to the sa... continue reading »

324 signatures Goal: 1,000
All Signatures (324 total)
226.
John C 1 March 2013
227.
Kristina M 25 February 2013
228.
Nick C 25 February 2013

"Post Code rg4 7ld The proposed sale of land that is not owned by RBC is a disgrace"

229.
Peter B 23 February 2013
230.
Timothy B 15 February 2013
231.
Stephen W 8 February 2013

"Post Code RG4 7HL This land should be preserved as a green space, Compensatory open space at Clayfield Copse is no compensation at all for local residents. More and more spaces, such as gardens are being built on & we need to preserve some open space"

232.
Frances K 29 January 2013

"Post Code RG4 7BP I'm disgusted that we haven't been given a real choice - that of refusing any building on the park, another example of the Council manipulating the public vote; the park is not theirs to use"

233.
Peter T 29 January 2013
234.
Margaret K 27 January 2013
235.
Roy D 23 January 2013
236.
Me Q 19 January 2013
237.
Fiona R 18 January 2013
238.
Mr Paulm 10 January 2013

"Post Code RG4 7AN Reading Council are setting a trend. They fail to maintain a facility and then attempt to use it for another purpose. This attitude is illustrated by their schemes for Kings Meadow, Hills Meadow and now Mapledurham playing fields."

239.
Tom I 2 January 2013

"Post Code RG47LB I believe that the current consultation on Mapledurham Playing Fields is flawed and doesnt give local users of the facillties the opportunity to register our true views. My true preference is to preserve the Mapledurham Playing Fields in"

240.
Francis B 31 December 2012
241.
Kelly E 27 December 2012
242.
Paul W 22 December 2012
243.
Sarah A 18 December 2012

"Post Code rg4 7ds in an increasingly heavily populated area it is essential that areas for recreation are available - and also this land was donated with specific request as to its usage and it is not acceptable to change this. Perhaps better management "

244.
David S 12 December 2012

"Post Code RG4 7DL The current consultation questionnaire does not offer the option of not selling any land, which commanded substantial support at the earlier survey."

245.
Isobel W 3 December 2012

"Post Code RG4 7BN It would be awful to destroy such a wonderful area were alot goes on. I personally walk my dog there all the time and it is on a main road which would be hurrendous with the school time traffic. I personally attended Caversham Primary a"

246.
Gemma F 30 November 2012
247.
Michele W 12 November 2012
248.
Matthew W 11 November 2012
249.
J B 5 November 2012
250.
Rob H 4 November 2012

"Post Code RG4 7LU I do not want any development except repair or replacement of the pavilion as it is. I do not want any land sold. I do not want the school moved from Hemdean Road - it will make traffic chaos."

« 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 »