Save Serotek

On May 14, 2007, Freedom Scientific, Inc. filed a trademark infringement complaint (case 8:07-cv-00829-SCB-TGW) against Serotek Corporation in United States District Court, for the Middle District of... continue reading »

350 signatures Goal: 100
All Signatures (350 total)
226.
Cathleen R 1 July 2010

"If it can help others, why argue over petty issues"

227.
Jack H 22 June 2010

"В"

228.
Michael C 31 May 2010

"no name confusion at all"

229.
Mark L 6 May 2010

"I have never confused Freedom Box with Freedom Scientific, and I feel that the use of the word freedom is not infringing on the trademark of Freedom Scientific."

230.
Paula K 27 April 2010

"I support this petition"

231.
Chris J 26 April 2010

"I support this petition"

232.
Korin T 23 April 2010

"I support this petition"

233.
Sandy B 18 April 2010

"Please redirect your resources to something more worthwhile"

234.
Joanna D 7 April 2010

"I support this petition"

235.
Andrew B 6 April 2010

"I do not use Freedom Box, but i feel that its developer has every right to market it. We need more, not less competition in the adaptive tech field."

236.
Mohammed Abbasr 15 February 2010

"I support this petition"

237.
Max S 10 February 2010

"This lawsuit is the height of silliness and bad taste. If you truly believe there are patent issues, it's your right; but I'm just glad I don't use *any* FS products at this time."

238.
Duyahn W 9 February 2010

"I believe that Freedom Scientific has had there hand in to many pots and can't find the right ingrediants."

239.
Barbara O 29 January 2010

"I support this petition"

240.
Franklin S 26 January 2010

"As I recall, Freedom Box was around in the 90s, before Freedom Scientific was formed. Who should be suing whom?"

241.
Jennifer T 18 January 2010

"I support this petition"

242.
Rob Mckenzie 14 December 2009

"Freedom Box is a good soluton and I don't think that Serotek is a company that would try to confuse people. They even say that they are not trying to get users to think that JAWS or any other screen reader is a bad screen reader, all the screen readers ar"

243.
Diane B 29 November 2009

"I think it is terrible that a bigger company like Freedom Scientific would go after a smaller company like Serotek just because they use the word freedom in the name of one of their products. This word is not owned by anyone, but should be enjoyed by all "

244.
John S 21 November 2009

"If FS were genuinely concerned about product confusion (is it really a problem?) then they could just ask for an injunction. But no, they ask for treble damages, allege fraud under the Lanham Act, claim "damage to its reputation" (!), and that "remedy at "

245.
Hannah Maea 15 November 2009

"I support this petition"

246.
Rev Pauladh 19 October 2009

"I support this petition"

247.
Robert Mh 9 October 2009

"I support this petition"

248.
Mary B 8 October 2009

"I support this petition"

249.
James C 8 October 2009

"I don't see the need for this lawsuit. Instead of bickering over names, why not work together to make the best technology for the blind possible?"

250.
Shelly N 7 September 2009

"I support this petition"

« 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 14 »