Scrap the Kent Section 28

The Queer Youth Alliance - the UK Alliance of lgbt young people.We believe that a local implementation of the recently departed Section 28 is damaging to our childen. We would like to see Kent repeal... continue reading »

1,000 signatures Goal: 1,000
All Signatures (1,000 total)
26.
Angela H 20 January 2016
27.
Beyzade Pierce 19 January 2016

"scrap this nonsense!"

28.
Dorothy G 18 January 2016
29.
Michael W 18 January 2016

"Section 28 has ruined the lives of many lgbt young people, I am appawled that in this day and age there are still people who would withold information and services from those who need it most... Its Ridiculous and it must go!"

30.
Adam S 16 January 2016

"Seriously, what century do we live in???"

31.
Clare Trujillo 16 January 2016
32.
George K 14 January 2016
33.
David C 13 January 2016
34.
Rachel Bolton 12 January 2016

"Hatred and bigotry cause far more damage to children than any imagined danger anyone may perceive lies within the acceptance and celebration of our differences"

35.
Craig C 12 January 2016
36.
David C 11 January 2016

"Doncaster says 'Scrap the Kent Secton 28'!!!"

37.
Christine B 11 January 2016

"Scrap it before Kent gets a badname for itself"

38.
Albert F 11 January 2016
39.
Nael F 10 January 2016
40.
Nicky Estes 10 January 2016

"it's sick"

41.
Chris G 10 January 2016

"That is quite possibly the worst thing i have ever heard in my entire life! How can kent justify this!"

42.
Yolanda B 10 January 2016
43.
Nick W 10 January 2016

"Section 28 - Backwards, prejudiced and down right wrong!"

44.
Ewan J 9 January 2016

"As a youth worker, I have over 10 years experience of the damage that this pernicious and unnecessary legislation has done to many in a generation of young people. It served only to keep the needs of lesbian and gay young people hidden. It meant that homo"

45.
Christopher Lesliep 7 January 2016

"If the government sees it appropriate to remove a policy such as this, then it must be for a good reason. Reinstating a prejudiced clause that is going to harm children who need protecting (by not allowing them to learn about themselves, and things such a"

46.
Adam D 6 January 2016
47.
Paul H 5 January 2016
48.
Sarah S 5 January 2016

"In the context of the two alternatives, heterosexual or homosexual relationships, any promotion of the one and silence on the subject of the other would have the effect of denigrating the other."

49.
Mark Sexton 4 January 2016
50.
Andy H 31 December 2015
« 1 2 3 4 ... 40 »