S.T.O.P. Grand Parkway Seg C Toll

SPEAK UP NOW!!!! If you believe the Grand Parkway Segment C toll road (also known as State Highway 99, or SH 99) is not necessary , is a waste of taxpayers money in Texas and deserves no mo... continue reading »

696 signatures Goal: 10,000
All Signatures (696 total)
476.
Shirley Bell · Richmond 21 February 2010
477.
Ed Bastian · 77479 21 February 2010
478.
Matt Cieslewicz · Richmond 21 February 2010
479.
Diana hernandez · Richmond 21 February 2010

"no rezoning!!"

480.
aldo solimano · richmond 21 February 2010
481.
LaShondra Holmes · Fresno 21 February 2010

"I'm more frustrated with taxpayers have to pay twice to utilize roadways - we pay for TxDOT and then we have to pay to use the toll road. Not only is it environmentally unsound, but it has negative ecomonic impact upon surrounding property owners."

482.
Evette Hernandez · Richmond 21 February 2010

"No re-zoning. "

483.
Amy Okie · Sugar Land 21 February 2010
484.
JAY FARRIS · RICHMOND 21 February 2010

"A TOLL ROAD IS NOT NEEDED AND IS ONLY SUPPORTED BY LAND DEVELOPERS. TEXAS DOESN'T HAVE THE MONEY AND SELLING OUR SOIL TO A FOREIGN COUNTRY WOULD BE A CRIME. THERE ARE FAR BETTER AND LESS DISRUPTIVE ALTERNATIVES IF THE ROAD IS TO GO THRU. "

485.
Melvern & Rita Scott · Richmond 21 February 2010

"we donot want the toll road coming through our area."

486.
Tor-Ivar Guttulsrod · Sugar Land 21 February 2010

"The Grand Parkway Section C planning seems to incorporate business and residentail concerns into the plana in most areas except for the area close to 59. If the road is developed, a route further to the south for 59 crossing should be used. Under no circ"

487.
Kenneth Antwi · Richmond 21 February 2010

"It is very bad to have a toll road round area. Waste of taxpayers money in Texas and will destroy not only valuable natural resources but entire communities. Thanks "

488.
Bethany Smithers · Richmond 21 February 2010
489.
Pierre L'Ecuyer · Richmond 20 February 2010

"I do not believe that this toll road will benefit the residents of this community. I oppose this idea."

490.
Trudi and Max Esses · Sugar Land 20 February 2010
491.
Carolyn Delasbour · Richmond 20 February 2010
492.
Tamara Bird · Richmond 20 February 2010

"Fort Bend County prides itself on the quality of life it's residents enjoy, yet we find ourselves in the brink of loosing all that. Where are our elected officials? Have they abandoned us? We moved to Canyon Gate because of the peace and quiet it afford"

493.
Craig Richter · Richmond 20 February 2010

"No Toll Road"

494.
Tatyana Serrano · Richmond 20 February 2010

"I am against rezoning due to the safety and distance. Williams elementary is located on FM 762 where the traffic every morning is horrible and to get there will take double time compare to Dickinson elementary school. The building of Williams elementary s"

495.
Kim Vanek · Richmond 20 February 2010

"Knowing that this tollroad was coming through why would you let commercial real estate as well as new subdivisions be built just to tear it down several years later? "

496.
Scott Hansen · Richmond 20 February 2010
497.
Lance Mozingo · Richmond 20 February 2010
498.
Peter A. Douglas · Richmond 20 February 2010

"Back in 2000-2001 at a meeting of Bridlewood home owners commissioner Tom Stavonia stated to me "The Grand Parkway would go where the George Foundation wanted it to go, end of discussion". How much control does the Foundation have? Would discover in a la"

499.
Priscilla L'Ecuyer · Richmond 20 February 2010

"I do not believe that this toll road will benefit the residents of this community. I oppose this idea."

500.
terrance · richmond 20 February 2010

"do not think that it will help it will only hurt us .don't want in here."

« 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 ... 28 »