Tintagel Mast

People living close to Bossiney Mast at Tintagel should have been given the chance to oppose it before it was erected. continue reading »

291 signatures Goal: 1,000
All Signatures (291 total)
251.
N J 8 October 2002

"What an eyesore, it could not be worse !!!"

252.
Jolly D 7 October 2002

"People living close to the mast should have been given the chance to object before it was erected"

253.
Dpsoloman Andrews 6 September 2002

"Mark Andrews and Cornwall Council should think again. If the mast is lawful then logically, using these tactics, anyone can build anything, anywhere. Planning no longer has a meaning. It is hard to believe Cornwall Council may condone such actions."

254.
Andrew H 1 August 2002

"Just discusting!!"

255.
John S 13 July 2002

"These people's rights have been trampled on."

256.
Margaret B 22 June 2002

"This mast should never have been allowed to extend as it has - it must be removed to an alternative site"

257.
J F 4 June 2002

"This blot on the landscape will be what BOB FLOWER will ALWAYS be remembered for."

258.
Dylan J 30 May 2002

"Tintagel Council is just a SELF-HELP GROUP."

259.
Fred G 9 April 2002

"I have looked closely at this mast. It is a disgusting, unnecessary eyesore. If 5 of your own councillors voted to keep it there then the lunatics have taken over the asylum."

260.
Chris R 7 April 2002

"People living close to the mast should have been given the chance to object before it was erected, How come they wern't?"

261.
Paul M 6 March 2002

"HELP! We are represented by unelected councillors who are prepared to break the law. Given the chance to put it right, they have turned it down. Wake up you people, this is supposed to be a democracy."

262.
M Jc 18 February 2002

"I have just learned that 5 Tintagel councillors voted to keep this disgusting thing in the AONB. Are they blind, stupid or both?"

263.
Mr Davidl 15 January 2002

"I support this petition"

264.
Mike C 8 January 2002

"People living close to the mast should have been given the chance to object before it was erected"

265.
Douglas F 7 January 2002

"No planning permission, no respect for local tourist industry, no respect for local residents!"

266.
Daisy M 4 January 2002

"It is difficult to know who is worst. The councillors who are lining their own pockets by forcing this ugly un-needed monstrosity onto this beauty-spot or the people of Tintagel who are watching and doing nothing."

267.
Peter N 4 January 2002

"Give me the name of one planning officer who would like to have it where he lives?"

268.
John T 29 November 2001

"Such a shame to do that to the area!"

269.
S F 13 November 2001

"People living close to the mast should have been given the chance to object before it was erected, How come they wern't?"

270.
Paul H 20 October 2001

"Why weren't people living close to the mast given the chance to object before it was erected????"

271.
Christine B 16 October 2001

"I agree with comment 305 below."

272.
Mrs D 3 October 2001

"This mast eyesore in a AONB is EXACTLY what the planning committee are supposed to protect us against."

273.
Edward H 15 September 2001

"We are on holiday in Tintagel and we think the Mast is awful."

274.
Sam Andjanetf 7 September 2001

"It is an indictment on Tintagel Parish Council that its response to mast objections is one of condemnation rather than troubled inner scrutiny."

275.
Buster L 4 September 2001

"People living close to the mast should have been given the chance to object before it was erected"

« 1 ... 9 10 11 12 »