Wild Thompson Steelhead

Currently, the Bristish Columbia Ministry of Environment (MOE) does not support hatchery augmentation of Thompson River steelhead, a position supported by the Steelhead Stream Classification Policy (S... continue reading »

750 signatures Goal: 1,000
All Signatures (750 total)
526.
Todd H 7 May 2014

"City/Country US Hatchery steelhead on the Thompson would have extreme negative impacts on wild stocks. Don't ruin your wonderful resource as the US has with many of it's rivers in the Pacific Northwest."

527.
Jim A 7 May 2014

"City/Country B.C Canada too many years trying to preserve this river, a hatchery would ruin all of that hard work."

528.
Bryce L 6 May 2014

"City/Country Prince George BC Canada Its time the BC Government puts some energy back into the environment."

529.
George W 6 May 2014
530.
Wayne S 4 May 2014

"City/Country Redmond,WA How could you even consider bringing hatcheries into play.The science says stop the netting of salmon and steelhead in the rivers , stop the bait fishing(antidiluvian management) Why don't you close it to all fishing for 6 years? "

531.
Bill R 3 May 2014
532.
Charles Kalanikahahawaii 3 May 2014
533.
Gary M 2 May 2014
534.
Tim M 30 April 2014
535.
Peter Dalton 30 April 2014
536.
Stephen Clarkeb 29 April 2014
537.
Adam Deboschk 28 April 2014
538.
Mike Bk 27 April 2014
539.
Jeff H 27 April 2014
540.
Charles Stp 27 April 2014
541.
Colin L 26 April 2014
542.
Robin W 24 April 2014
543.
Gary B 24 April 2014

"City/Country Hobart,Wa 98025 Why not work on the native steelhead recovery.Hatchery fish will only mess things up worst."

544.
Jennifer G 24 April 2014
545.
Ca Dew 23 April 2014
546.
Gary A 23 April 2014
547.
Mariusz W 22 April 2014
548.
Travis W 20 April 2014
549.
Steve S 20 April 2014
550.
Bunnarith L 19 April 2014
« 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 ... 30 »