Wild Thompson Steelhead

Currently, the Bristish Columbia Ministry of Environment (MOE) does not support hatchery augmentation of Thompson River steelhead, a position supported by the Steelhead Stream Classification Policy (S... continue reading »

750 signatures Goal: 1,000
All Signatures (750 total)
151.
David B 16 July 2015
152.
Scott H 15 July 2015

"City/Country Lake Tapps, WA USA Science shows that the reproductive success rate of hatchery fish is very low. Introducing hatchery fish to the Thompson will damage the few remaining wild steel heads chances to reproduce."

153.
Raffaele M 14 July 2015
154.
Calvin F 14 July 2015
155.
Rod V 13 July 2015
156.
Anto G 13 July 2015
157.
Dimitri G 10 July 2015
158.
Steve R 10 July 2015

"City/Country Battle Ground, WA Please do not create a steelhead hatchery for Thompson River Steelhead. The genetics are pure, and the risk of disease or mixed strains, is not worth it."

159.
Brian K 9 July 2015
160.
Edmond Rl 7 July 2015

"City/Country Portland, Oregon I travel to BC every fall to flyfish for wild steelhead, but there is no incentive to visit a hatchery supplanted river since that is availalbe in the Columbia River system."

161.
Arwi O 5 July 2015

"City/Country Costa Mesa , california Keep our Thompson River steelhead Wild!"

162.
Fay M 4 July 2015

"City/Country Spokane, WA No hatcheries on the Thompson!"

163.
Shannon G 3 July 2015
164.
Deb P 1 July 2015
165.
Rob Lowe 28 June 2015
166.
Melissa M 28 June 2015

"City/Country Canada Please, please, please keep"

167.
Scott R 26 June 2015
168.
Mike W 24 June 2015
169.
Kirsten S 24 June 2015
170.
Lee R 23 June 2015
171.
A G 23 June 2015

"City/Country Scotland В"

172.
Paul Desl 22 June 2015
173.
Corbin L 18 June 2015
174.
Brian T 16 June 2015
175.
Larry Eh 15 June 2015
« 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... 30 »