Against Changing the Child Actors of Harry Potter.
There is a rumor going around that the child actors of the Harry Potter movies are going to be replaced. The theory is they are getting to old for the parts. Even if this has not been confirmed I say... continue reading »
"As the characters in the books get older so do real people so i see no piont in changing the actors... plus it won't be the same if their is new actors. Harry potter forever age 15"
"ridiculous! address 6601 victoria ave #205 highland, ca 92346 age 22 years"
"I love Harry potter and changing the characters would ruin the whole thing it just wouldn't be the same with new and different people. age 15"
"DON'T CHANGE 'EM. IT WILL RUIN THE SERIES age 13"
"leave them be they are what makes the movies great"
"I think harry should stay on the movie address 26 pring st hendra age 16"
"Please don't change da characterz. age 19"
"well the characters in the harry potter series are getting older, so are the actors in the movies, so it's a perfect fit! plus, it wouldnt be the same if they got new people for the characters because we got the current ones in our heads and it would be T"
"Keep on it DAN, Rupert, Emma, Tom! U guys rock!!!!!"
"it would ruin the movie"
"I believe that changing the characters in midstream would make them seem unfamiliar and it would just seem odd."
"no you can't damn it! if you change them everyone will be like huh? who the HELLis that ?anyways you can't get rid of Tom Felton he is so HOT!!!! age 15"
"The point of the HP series is to watch Harry grow to be a young man. You can't do that if you keep replacing with younger people. Also, it gets harder to identify with a new take on a character. Keep the current actors!!"
"I will not see the other movies with out the original kids. age 40"
