Against Changing the Child Actors of Harry Potter.
There is a rumor going around that the child actors of the Harry Potter movies are going to be replaced. The theory is they are getting to old for the parts. Even if this has not been confirmed I say... continue reading »
"I would stop watching HP if you changed the actors. age 16"
"Please, get Ian McKellen to play Dumbledore!!! age 34"
"Harry potter wont be the same without the actors they have now!!!"
"I love you harry age 18"
"Yeah, it just wouldn't be the same without the original actors.................*Sighs* age 13"
"Obviously the actors already have a fanbase and have grown into the part wonderfully. Replacing them with new actors would no do the series justice and would alienate fans."
"RUPERT GRINT IS RON WEASLEY! NO!!!!! you can NOT change that."
"I think they shouldn't be replaced because look at home alone he was to old, he was 14 playing a 9 year old role"
"Gatta keep the boys^_^(at lest) age 15"
"The movies are great with the actors present, DON'T CHANGE THEM!!!"
"I like Daniel Radcliffe!"
"the actors are magnificant! age 15"
"harry potter is the best :D age 13"
"obviously the movies won't make much money as the others age 13"
"I ADORE the actors already in the series. They get better and better every film! If you took any of them away and recast it wouldn't be Harry Potter anymore. I wouldn't watch the new ones either. There's no way it could be the same. That goes for ANY and "
"T'wudn't be the same. 'nuff said age 17"
"I'm absolutely OBSESSED with Dan Radcliffe! and so obviously i want him, Emma and Rupert to carry on, but i do realise that they might want to go to college and university age 15"
