Campaign for Cat Hill

We strongly object to the plans submitted to Enfield Council by L&Q Housing Association to build 271 dwellings. In this process woodland and protected wildlife will be destroyed, services will be... continue reading »

400 signatures Goal: 100
All Signatures (400 total)
301.
Denise B 20 May 2005

"I support this petition"

302.
Kim S 3 May 2005

"I support this petition"

303.
Jennifer S 2 April 2005

"I support this petition"

304.
Bambinos I 28 March 2005

"the housing will put too much pressure on local area"

305.
Ron G 22 March 2005

"The scheme is far to big for the area"

306.
Neil M 16 March 2005

"If you send me an email address I will send you a copy of the critique I have sent to Enfield re Urban Design , Transport and Travel proposals"

307.
Jason R 7 March 2005

"I support this petition"

308.
Kevin B 3 March 2005

"Save the wildlife"

309.
Mr Mariog 23 February 2005

"this development must be stopped"

310.
Richard C 16 February 2005

"I support this petition"

311.
Aallenstein Ray 4 February 2005

"A gross over development of the site"

312.
Samir S 31 January 2005

"I support this petition"

313.
Margaret B 26 January 2005

"I support this petition"

314.
Gemma Eaton 26 December 2004

"I support this petition"

315.
Paul R 29 November 2004

"My main concern is high rise multi-storey buidings - we have seen the type of social harm caused by high-density, high rise housing estates."

316.
Stephen R 26 November 2004

"I support this petition"

317.
Alex Patterson 6 November 2004

"This development must be stopped"

318.
Alan C 26 October 2004

"I support this petition"

319.
Harold S 25 October 2004

"I support this petition"

320.
Alan D 30 September 2004

"I strongly object to this development"

321.
Bryan L 26 August 2004

"I have lived in the area for 38 years, Cockfosters is a unique part of London who's character will be totally destroyed once the proposed development of 270 or more dwellings are constructed and habited by in excess of 1000 people, The reason we live in t"

322.
Lisa H 13 August 2004

"I support this petition"

323.
Shane M 11 August 2004

"I support this petition"

324.
Roger Leoa 6 August 2004

"A bizarre development proposal and whoever thought it up needs their head examining. Is there possibly any connection with making money here?!? Where's the benefit to the public at large? It should be preserved for in perpetuity for the benefit of the peo"

325.
Dr Georges 10 July 2004

"It is quite obviously unacceptable that open spaces such as this should be developed for housing without a full and open review process taking into account the views of the local community and all impact assessments that must and should be carried out. On"

« 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 »