Campaign for Cat Hill

We strongly object to the plans submitted to Enfield Council by L&Q Housing Association to build 271 dwellings. In this process woodland and protected wildlife will be destroyed, services will be... continue reading »

400 signatures Goal: 100
All Signatures (400 total)
276.
Joseph M 19 January 2006

"No to tower blocks, terrible idea"

277.
Dawn E 26 December 2005

"I support this petition"

278.
Fred Irenem 20 December 2005

"we have not moved to a place where no high rise flats are just to have it all changed by a housing acc (LQ).people spend their life to save the rain forest,but quite happy to cut down the trees in england,we need the trees that are the campus"

279.
Lois C 3 December 2005

"I strongly object to the proposal because - - change of use from education to residential means a loss of about 300 jobs at a time when further employment especially youth employment is a priority need - 6 story buildings (blocks of flats) are inappropria"

280.
Kim P 18 November 2005

"I support this petition"

281.
N O 9 November 2005

"I support this petition"

282.
Adam A 30 October 2005

"I am very upset to hear about the plans to cut down the trees for this project development and also to hear that the height of the buildings as well as the size will be astethically unpleaseing to the eye ( five six storey Blocks )"

283.
Hector Brewer 28 October 2005

"I support this petition"

284.
Johanna B 21 October 2005

"Concerned about wildlife and open spaces"

285.
Stuart W 17 October 2005

"I support this petition"

286.
Soulla K 14 October 2005

"This is a very nice area we live in. We have paidf a premium to live here and do not want rif raf here"

287.
Ann H 5 October 2005

"The site was originally for educational use and given its position with the increase of cars and pedestrians it will become a dangerous spot and will add to the already heavy congestion. The entrance and exit of this site are on two very busy roads!"

288.
A B 2 October 2005

"I support this petition"

289.
Alicia N 1 October 2005

"I support this petition"

290.
Abi J 24 September 2005

"I support this petition"

291.
Katie P 5 September 2005

"I support this petition"

292.
Rasheed S 21 August 2005

"This development would put unmanageable pressure on services such as the education, utilities, traffic congestion, it would destroy ancient woodland and damage protected wildlife. This size of development is wholly unsuitable for this area and the money t"

293.
David E 16 August 2005

"Objection to Cat Hill Development"

294.
Maria Gentry 6 August 2005

"I support this petition"

295.
Raphael Stout 20 July 2005

"As a student at Southgate school I belive that building this development can result in many negative areas such as; causinng more traffic in the morning, making it more dangerous for pupils who walk to school and this can also result in making children la"

296.
Andreas K 14 July 2005

"I would vote this council out next local elections if this development goes ahead"

297.
Ronald H 28 June 2005

"I support this petition"

298.
Glynice S 21 June 2005

"An overdevelopment with insufficient parking and infrastructure in place"

299.
Brinda G 11 June 2005

"I support this petition and believe that the development would be of detriment to the local environment and place a strain on local traffic and resources."

300.
Keely G 28 May 2005

"Say no to the development at the top of Cat Hill we want education not concrete."

« 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... 16 »