Campaign for Cat Hill

We strongly object to the plans submitted to Enfield Council by L&Q Housing Association to build 271 dwellings. In this process woodland and protected wildlife will be destroyed, services will be... continue reading »

400 signatures Goal: 100
All Signatures (400 total)
201.
Irena S 29 October 2008

"I support this petition"

202.
Stephen F 28 October 2008

"I support this petition"

203.
Talia M 25 October 2008

"just moved in the area tower blocks would be horrible"

204.
Edward H 14 October 2008

"I support this petition"

205.
Benjamin M 28 September 2008

"totally disagree with building towers in Cockfosters"

206.
Joan N 22 September 2008

"I support this petition"

207.
Oli S 18 September 2008

"I support this petition"

208.
Vanessa G 14 August 2008

"I am very concerned about the density of the proposed plans. Far too many dwellings and high rise flats are out of keeping with the surrounding area."

209.
Polly W 31 July 2008

"Development much too big and out of keeping with the surrounding area"

210.
Simon G 19 July 2008

"This is an overdevelopment, insensitive to the area, without any planning gain."

211.
James T 25 June 2008

"I am opposed to this development as it appears misguided and totally inappropriate to our community. Many of the local people in East Barnet, Cockfosters & Oakwood are very concerned and Enfield council have so far behaved with arrogance with regards "

212.
Eloise C 11 June 2008

"I support this petition"

213.
Eva P 8 June 2008

"I support this petition"

214.
Barbara F 29 May 2008

"I support this petition"

215.
Wendy W 25 May 2008

"Our household strongly opposes the proposed development of the Cat Hill site. We agree that multi storey dwellings are definately not in keeping with the area and the additional 271 proposed homes will put immense pressure on the already stretched infrast"

216.
David C 25 May 2008

"I support this petition"

217.
Karen N 15 May 2008

"I support this petition"

218.
Simone V 19 April 2008

"I support this petition"

219.
Christine N 17 April 2008

"The proposed plans are too vast for the area. The trees and wildlife will be lost and there will be no going back."

220.
A A 11 April 2008

"The trees on the site are very important to the health of the local residents.They guard us from pollution and noise.They are the lungs of the area and should stay as they are or we will all suffer."

221.
Ele N 22 March 2008

"services in the area can not handle such an influx of citizens...the developmnet is not in keeping with the area...removal of an educational establishment whe we are desperate for schools"

222.
Sheila G 22 March 2008

"I support this petition"

223.
Viplob S 10 February 2008

"Totally against this development"

224.
Patricia G 8 February 2008

"I support this petition"

225.
Jeffrey P 25 January 2008

"Yet again,more trees are to destroyed in the name of profit and growth. Already we have seen the destruction of woods at Grange Park, and a hideous new training ground at Bulls Cross. Will Enfield council not be content until the whole of Enfield is one h"

« 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 ... 16 »