Campaign for Cat Hill

We strongly object to the plans submitted to Enfield Council by L&Q Housing Association to build 271 dwellings. In this process woodland and protected wildlife will be destroyed, services will be... continue reading »

400 signatures Goal: 100
All Signatures (400 total)
226.
Daniel K 13 January 2008

"We stronly object to this large scale housing development .It will destroy the Cockfosters environment .It will impact on the local environment , increase congestion , destroy ancient woodland and open space .It is too large a complex and needs to be reje"

227.
Mark N 5 January 2008

"I support this petition"

228.
David V 2 January 2008

"This would be devastating for the entire area"

229.
Amanda T 22 December 2007

"I support this petition"

230.
Cllr Joannat 20 December 2007

"I support this petition"

231.
George A 17 December 2007

"strongly against the plans"

232.
Maureen R 15 November 2007

"I support this petition"

233.
James Rios 13 November 2007

"I support this petition"

234.
Ms Ivonel 28 September 2007

"DO NOT AGREE WITH THE L&Q PROPOSAL"

235.
Pat C 27 September 2007

"I strongly object to the proposed plans for Cat Hill. I do not feel it is an appopriate site for such proposals and will spoil what is a lovely woodland area."

236.
Gerald R 22 September 2007

"The proposed development is not sympathetic to its surroundings, its design is computer generated to maximise square footage for resale optimisation, this simply is not in keeping with Cockfosters. The impact on the services in the immediate area has not "

237.
Peter H 9 September 2007

"I support this petition"

238.
Vicky S 30 August 2007

"stop cat hill middlesex university site from being demolished."

239.
Kim C 3 August 2007

"I support this petition"

240.
Vicki P 30 July 2007

"I support this petition"

241.
Dave A 19 July 2007

"I support this petition"

242.
Lindsay R 5 July 2007

"I strongly oppose this buildling work"

243.
David Tombackf 26 June 2007

"As a chartered surveyor, I believe the current proposals are an overdevelopment of the site and that the buildings are out of keeping with the area. In addition, the traffic generated by the proposed scheme would be unacceptable and cause huge conjestion "

244.
Hazelvoller Williams 18 June 2007

"I support this petition"

245.
Kaya Jamest 3 June 2007

"I support this petition"

246.
Paul Andbarbaraw 3 June 2007

"We have e/mailed each member of the planning panel with our objections. Various and numerous and all very relavent. This unwanted project must not go ahead. I will ruin the Barnet/Southgate/Cockfosters neighbourhood. Please planning Committee reject it, w"

247.
Prini S 18 May 2007

"I support this petition"

248.
Mr Brunodes 13 May 2007

"I support this petition"

249.
Antonia L 15 April 2007

"I support this petition"

250.
Alana K 9 April 2007

"I support this petition"

« 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 16 »