Stop the Lorne Park Secondary School Boundary Change

Lorne Park Secondary School (LPSS) is currently overcrowded, exceeding the ministry guidelines for capacity. It is forecasted to continue to be stressed in this way in the forseeable future.Peel Distr... continue reading »

491 signatures Goal: 100
All Signatures (491 total)
251.
Marypat M 26 March 2012

"I support this petition"

252.
Steven W 21 March 2012

"Considering that a large portion of my property tax dollars (over $25000/year!) goes towards education, I would expect a substantial reduction if this inane proposal comes to fruition. Address 1580 Watersedge Road"

253.
Rhys T 18 March 2012

"One of the reasons the subdivision known as Watercolors was approved for development is that it was agreed that the exsisting schools would not be flooded with student from these new homes why the change. Address 858 Kowal Drive"

254.
Debra B 14 March 2012

"I support this petition"

255.
Sandy F 12 March 2012

"I strongly disagree with this proposal because I paid a premium to live within the boundary to send my kids to Lorne Park High School - residents of Watercolours did not and bought knowing they weren't entitled to attend L.P. H.S Address 1694 Pengilley Pl"

256.
Robert R 10 March 2012

"I support this petition"

257.
Stephen B 29 February 2012

"I support this petition"

258.
Vicki J 28 February 2012

"I support this petition"

259.
Janet O 26 February 2012

"I support this petition"

260.
Janet K 2 February 2012

"I support this petition"

261.
Josie S 31 January 2012

"If there is room at LPSS and it will not force another motion to move extended french out of LPSS - extend the boundary to include the Rattray Park area - residents who have been part of the community for over 40 years."

262.
Jason M 30 January 2012

"I support this petition"

263.
Louise C 18 January 2012

"I support this petition"

264.
Judy G 16 January 2012

"I support this petition"

265.
Parm J 1 January 2012

"I support this petition"

266.
Michael W 22 December 2011

"I support this petition"

267.
Debi S 9 December 2011

"If the school is already overcrowded why add to the problem? It is inappropriate to change the boundaries to satisfy one neighbourhood group which thinks it is entitled without good reason, beyond alleged promises that were made to them when they purchase"

268.
Susan S 7 December 2011

"I support this petition"

269.
Susan B 6 December 2011

"This proposal is only in the interest of Watercolour residents, who knew when they decided to purchase their homes what their school catchment area would be. Mr Stephens does not represent the interests of the majority of students, parents and teachers in"

270.
Laurie E 6 December 2011

"I support this petition"

271.
Tiberiu M 3 December 2011

"I support this petition"

272.
Trevor S 1 December 2011

"I support this petition"

273.
Irene C 23 November 2011

"I support this petition"

274.
Paul S 18 November 2011

"Residents of Watercolours bought knowing their designated school was Port Credit. Why is it that students (& families) who have planned and invested for years in this community are considered second rate and are to be readily discarded in the event th"

275.
Anthony K 6 November 2011

"I support this petition"

« 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 ... 20 »