Parents for Quality Math Education

Several years ago, our school district adopted new math programs for use in grades K-8. According to SCASD administrators, this change was made to improve continuity, because previously teachers were... continue reading »

700 signatures Goal: 1,000
All Signatures (700 total)
576.
Robert J 13 April 2010

"Learning math requires worked examples to follow and practice. This curriculum provides neither. SCASD resident? No"

577.
Jessica O 8 April 2010
578.
Thomas Lb 31 March 2010
579.
Carol Ld 30 March 2010
580.
John H 27 March 2010
581.
Kristin N 27 March 2010
582.
Michael C 23 March 2010
583.
Priscilla S 23 March 2010
584.
Qiuyan C 13 March 2010

"Learning math is a great opportunity to practice abstract thinking even at young age. SCASD resident? No"

585.
Robert S 7 March 2010

"Focus on basic skills and automaticity is necessary for more advanced mathematics education SCASD resident? No"

586.
Kelly D 3 March 2010
587.
Stacey R 21 February 2010
588.
Debra Ap 19 February 2010
589.
Richard Wg 13 February 2010
590.
Deannine S 12 February 2010
591.
Chenpei Davidt 11 February 2010
592.
Andrew N 9 February 2010
593.
Benjamin T 9 February 2010

"В SCASD resident? No"

594.
Adrienne Johnston 8 February 2010

"Many of these new math programs are developed by teachers or former teachers who want to get published, make a name for themselves and make money. Some of the new methods are really interesting and work very well for the really smart kids. It gets them to"

595.
Stacey H 7 February 2010
596.
Matt V 7 February 2010

"There is a major fault to this current program. It is making math appear to be less useful than it is. Understanding the underlying concepts in mathematics is obviously important, but should not be at the expense of learning practical methods to use the c"

597.
Gregory R 2 February 2010
598.
Paulina E 26 January 2010

"В SCASD resident? No"

599.
Stephen Tingleym 19 January 2010
600.
Kathy R 13 January 2010
« 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 ... 28 »